Karl Marx Viewed Religion as Irrational Research Paper

Pages: 7 (2745 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 10  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Junior  ·  Topic: Mythology - Religion

Karl Marx viewed religion as irrational and as an exploitive tool of the status quo (Marx and Engels 1992), whereas Stark and Finke (2000) offer support for a new paradigm where religion can be viewed as being beneficial by social scientists on certain levels. The current paper discusses the potential utility of religious rituals and spirituality to ease the emotional suffering and stress of individuals who suffer from a terminal illness. Both the views of Marx and of Stark and Finke regarding religion in this context are compared and contrasted (although many of the tenants of Karl Marx must be inferred when discussing religion in this context). A general discussion/review of the research regarding the benefits of religious rituals and spiritual beliefs for terminally ill individuals is in order before discussing Marx and Stark and Finke's positions.

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
A terminal condition or terminal illness is defined as a condition/disease that cannot be adequately treated or cured (Glare, Virik, and Jones et al. 2003). When an individual is diagnosed with a terminal condition the probability is extremely high that the patient will die in a relatively short period of time. Thus, learning that one has a terminal condition results one of the most stressful experiences a person can endure (e.g. Holmes and Rahe 1967). Different individuals will react differently to this news; however, nearly everyone who is suddenly confronted with a terminal diagnosis goes through various stages of coping, although the specific stages and progression of the stages is still debated (Maciejewski et al. 2007). Due to the inescapable finality of being faced with death many people turn to spirituality or to religion to comfort them in this time of extreme stress (Thune-Boyle et al. 2006). Many of the stage theories describing this process of acceptance of one's fate incorporate a spiritual aspect (Maciejewski et al. 2007).

Research Paper on Karl Marx Viewed Religion as Irrational and Assignment

At this point it is important to make a distinction between religion and spirituality. Spirituality or being spiritual is the belief that a person is composed of physical and nonphysical (spiritual) aspects. These non-physical aspects are generally believed to tie the individual in with a higher form of meaning (Penman, Oliver, and Harrington 2009; Zinnbauer et al. 1997). Religion is defined as a belief in a God to be worshiped, usually by formalized rituals (Zinnbauer et al. 1997). Thus, it is not necessary to be religious in order to be spiritual; however, a religious person would also be considered to be a spiritual person. In this paper the term "spirituality" is used in the religious context where being spiritual is meant to imply the belief in a God and the subsequent use of religious rituals such as prayer in order to foster a relationship with this God.

Research has investigated the utility of religion and spirituality in individuals dealing with the diagnosis of a terminal illness. Penman et al. (2009) conducted a qualitative study that included in-depth interviews of four palliative care patients and ten palliative care caregivers. The interviews identified seven main themes individuals who have been diagnosed with a terminal illness display. Four of the themes related directly to God and religion, whereas three of the themes embodied spiritual engagement such as personal relationships and participating in religious practices. The researchers found that these themes led to positive practices and moved the individuals to try to understand the deeper meaning in all their activities. The researchers suggested that health care professionals working with these patients should assist them in maintaining these practices as such practices enhance coping skills.

Parvu et al. (2012) reviewed the theoretical and conceptual literature regarding coping patterns and coping with a terminal illness. Heavily influenced by the Kubler-Ross stages of grief, Parvu et al. supported the notion of using a coping pattern heavily influenced on religious rituals for dealing with a terminal condition as these rituals can be used by any individual, with any set societal or cultural values, and patients that invest in a religious coping pattern develop greater psychological well-being, better coping skills, and are less reactive than individuals not using these coping skills to deal with end-of-life issues. The authors suggest that health care teams working with terminal patients should include a counseling specialist with spiritual/religious training in order to avoid a spiritual crisis in both the patient and the patient's family.

Thun-Boyle (2006) reviewed 17 studies that examined the effects of religious/spiritual beliefs or behaviors as coping strategies for adults dealing with cancer. The general findings indicated that the strategies generally increased coping in individuals with cancer; however there were an equal number of nonsignificant results and three studies found some detrimental effects. There were several issues with methodology of the study such as how religious coping was actually operationalized, different studies had participants with different forms of cancer, and not all of the participants were terminal. The researchers suggested more focused approaches to studying the effects of religious beliefs on coping with cancer. Ekedahl and Wengstrom (2010) determined through interviews with 15 Swedish oncology nurses that their religiosity facilitated their coping skills when dealing with terminal patients. This included a sense of trust facilitated by prayer as a coping strategy. Rokack (2015) administered a questionnaire to HIV patients, cancer patients, and non-infected individuals to determine how individuals coped with the loneliness associated with a potentially terminal condition. All of the groups turned to religion and their faith as a coping measure; however, cancer patients and non-infected individuals were more similar in their coping styles. HIV patients tended to use more self-reflection.

Thus, the research generally supports the notion that religiosity, especially use of rituals such as prayer, provide some benefit to individuals with a terminal condition. However, there is another way to view this research. Karl Marx viewed religion as supporter of economic oppression (Stark and Finke 2000). Of course in his most famous statement Marx referred to religion as the opium of the people (Marx and Engels 1992; Stark and Finke 2000). Marx was of the opinion that religious beliefs are illusions that foster reasons to keep the classes in a stratified and in an unequal position (Stark and Finke 2000). This corresponds with Stark and Finke's (2000) first element of what they describe as the old paradigm of religion where religious beliefs were a central concern for social scientists due their potential for exploitation of the certain classes of people. Starke and Finke (2000) countered with a new paradigm to describe religion. In the current context Stark and Finke (2000) would point to the research that indicates that people with spiritual and religious commitments enjoy better physical and mental health and therefore religious rituals do serve constructive functions. Thus, most of the aforementioned research regarding religion and patients with terminal conditions could be used by Stark and Finke as evidence of their rebuttal to the old paradigm (the notion supported by Marx).

It may very well be that both Marx and Stark and Finke would agree that religious commitments and spirituality due help individuals accept the inevitable and keeping them from draining limited resources like medical care by not engaging in futile treatments (see Reiner 2007). However, Marx would object to the notion religious beliefs are necessary to ease stress in end-of-life situations. For Marx, religion and spiritual beliefs are delusions resulting in a failure of the individual to recognize reality. By rendering individuals submissive to their life station religion negates the dignity of these individuals. So while Marx might agree that religious beliefs and commitments might ease the stress and suffering for individuals with terminal illness, it could be argued from a Marxist point-of-view that religion is not necessary for this. Instead, accepting reality, understanding the situation fully, and accepting one's fate without religion would lead to an equally dignified condition. Thus, Stark and Finke (2000) emphasize religion as having a rational function by providing a protective effect, whereas Marx would counter that religion is irrational and delusional and is not necessary for such a protective effect if individuals accept reality. Religious rituals such as prayer are simply delusional approaches to coping from a Marxist view, whereas they are helpful coping mechanisms from Stark and Finke's rational view.

The empirical research supports this later view. For instance, Iwaszczyzszyn et al. (2013) performed a semantic analysis of the quality of life for patients in palliative care centers in Poland. They concluded that the medical establishment can improve the quality of life for patients by recognizing the issues that patients face such as continuing their relationships and recognizing their beliefs and religious views. Allowing terminal patients to utilize their spiritual and religious beliefs in the form of prayer and other rituals has been demonstrated to improve the quality of the patient's life. This would be consistent with Stark and Finke's (2000) theoretical model of a new paradigm that supports the utility of religion.

However, the major fault in this particular argument is the notion of what an "improved quality of life" constitutes. For instance, would it be ethical not to inform individuals who… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (7 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Marx Weber Durkheim Term Paper

God Exist? Humanities Fascination With Life Term Paper

Max Weber Protestant Ethic Research Proposal

Spirituality in Healthcare Term Paper

Friedrich Engels Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Karl Marx Viewed Religion as Irrational" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Karl Marx Viewed Religion as Irrational.  (2015, April 10).  Retrieved April 9, 2020, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/karl-marx-viewed-religion-irrational/9161062

MLA Format

"Karl Marx Viewed Religion as Irrational."  10 April 2015.  Web.  9 April 2020. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/karl-marx-viewed-religion-irrational/9161062>.

Chicago Style

"Karl Marx Viewed Religion as Irrational."  Essaytown.com.  April 10, 2015.  Accessed April 9, 2020.