Kidney Donor Compensation Critical Essay

Pages: 5 (1427 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 6  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Health  ·  Written: March 11, 2019

The act would also be just to the poor who would like to offer their organs for the sake of compensation. On the other hand, there are opponents of compensation. Some people feel that it is immoral to commoditize human organs. Doing so is a way of violating the dignity of human beings (Smith, 2016). Also, some feel that it is unethical because it is it exposes the poor to harm, hence violating the respect for the vulnerability of people. It would. Therefore, be a form of exploitation of the less privileged in the society. The political aspect is that the president who implements the policy will carry the fame if it succeeds in improving the lives of Americans or go down as a failure if the activity turns tragic for them.

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
The policy is proposed for the USA population and the world at large. There are various health goals that the proposed policy is designed to achieve. The Americans and the world population at large at large deserve good healthcare according to the Sustainable Development Goals. One of the goals that the policy is set to achieve is to reduce the rates of premature mortality of such illnesses by a third through treatment and prevention (Buse & Hawkes 2015). The policy will be a good fit for the goal of reducing the number of premature deaths by treating kidney patients. The policy requires various advocacy strategies to ensure maximum benefits. One of the ways is through civic education to inform people about the need to donate to the needy to save lives (Rees, 2017). Another way is to guide people on the morality aspects of the activity. Doing so will help them to gain a more positive view of the matter and not feel like their lives are commoditized and gain maximally from the policy.

Critical Essay on Kidney Donor Compensation Assignment

The implementation of the policy has diverse professional, moral, and Christian perspectives. The ethical view of the nursing profession is that people need organ donation to save their lives. The shortage of kidneys for transplant undermines their ability to save the lives of patients and give them the best healthcare possible. Increasing supply through compensation would, therefore, have a positive effect on their work (Smith, 2016). The moral obligation of the nurses, however, would also find it unethical because the proposed policy would undermine human dignity. It would be a way of propagating the already existing way of taking advantage of the vulnerable populations. It is also a way of showing doubt for the willingness of people to donate organs without external motivation. The Christian view is that it is necessary to donate organs but does not support trading them. The Catholic Church views it as a way of following Jesus Christ’s example of donating himself for the sake of believers (Smith, 2016).

The proposed policy of compensation of kidney donors is a controversial issue. The concern for human health and financial benefits is countered by the moral and Christian views on the commercialization of human organs. Although it is worth the consideration, implementation of the policy may prove difficult owing to the various issues surrounding the matter. There is a need for further research to help in ensuring the success of the issue while reducing its effects on ethical, political, professional, and legal matters.

  1. Buse, K., & Hawkes, S. (2015). Health in the sustainable development goals: ready for a paradigm shift?. Globalization and health, 11(1), 13.
  2. Held, P. J., McCormick, F., Ojo, A., & Roberts, J. P. (2016). A cost?benefit analysis of government compensation of kidney donors. American Journal of Transplantation, 16(3), 877-885.
  3. Shaw, R. M., & Bell, L. J. (2015). ‘Because you can't live on love’: living kidney donors’ perspectives on compensation and payment for organ donation. Health Expectations, 18(6), 3201-3212.
  4. Smith, H. J. (2016). The ethical implications and religious significance of organ transplantation payment systems. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 19(1), 33-44.
  5. Dalal, A. R. (2015). Philosophy of organ donation: review of ethical facets. World journal of transplantation, 5(2), 44.
  6. Rees, M. A., Dunn, T. B., Kuhr, C. S., Marsh, C. L., Rogers, J., Rees, S. E., ... & Fumo, D. E. (2017). Kidney exchange to overcome financial barriers… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (5 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Kidney Donation From Live Donors and Ethical Research Proposal

Nursing Kidney Nursing Perceptions and Live Thesis

Public Information on Kidney Donation Thesis

Human Organ Buying and Selling Term Paper

Phd Proposal Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Kidney Donor Compensation" Critical Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Kidney Donor Compensation.  (2019, March 11).  Retrieved September 19, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Kidney Donor Compensation."  11 March 2019.  Web.  19 September 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Kidney Donor Compensation."  March 11, 2019.  Accessed September 19, 2020.