Linguistic History of the Insular Celtic Language Family and Proto Thesis

Pages: 9 (2523 words)  ·  Style: MLA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 6  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Communication - Language

Linguistic History Of the Insular Celtic Family and Proto-Celtic

The Celts were ancient people in Europe who spoke the Celtic languages forming a branch of the European languages including other languages which are unknown but which have been associated with Celtic cultural traits in archaeological evidence. Celtic is used in contemporary times to describe the languages and cultures of Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Cornwall, the Isle of Man and the French region of Brittany however the Celtic language family includes the Gaelic languages of Scottish, Irish and Manx and the Brythonic languages of Welsh, Breton and Cornish.

The Celtic language family is said to be a branch of the larger Indo-European language and it has been hypothesized that the Celtic prototype language may have derived from the Pontic-Caspian steppes. By 600 BC the Celts had split into several groups of languages and had spread across Central Europe as well as Ireland and Britain and the Iberian Peninsula. The Celtic language is believed to have spread to Britain and Iberia during the first half of the first millennium and that this language developed over the centuries into the Celtiberian, Goidelic and Brythonic languages. There is a debate as to whether the Goidelic and Brythonic descend from a common Insular-Celtic language or if instead these languages are reflective of two waves of separate migration.

Figure 1

I. Two Branches of Celtic Language

The work of Fortson (2005) entitled: Indo-European Language and Culture" states that the Celtic languages "...hold a special place in the early history of Indo-European linguistics because they presented the first real challenge to the nascent science."(p.274) the surviving Celtic languages are un the form of unbroken traditional language and are stated to be confined "to a small corner of northwestern Europe -- Irish Gaelic in Ireland, Scottish Gaelic in Scotland, Welsh in Wales, and Breton in Brittany, located in northwest France with the number speaking these languages being one million or less.

Following the conquest of Gaul or ancient France by Julius Caesar and the subjugation of Britain by Claudius a century later "most of this Celtic-speaking territory was assimilated to the Roman world" and the dominant language became that of Latin which eventually resulted in the dying out of Gaulish and the other Continental Celtic languages. (Fortson, 2005, paraphrased)

The other branch of Celtic is that of Insular Celtic which includes all modern Celtic languages is stated to have "continued to flourish in the British Isles" and most particularly in Ireland since the separation of Ireland from Britain by the Irish Channel served to insulate Ireland from the affect of the Romans and from the Anglo-Saxons as well. It is stated that Ireland is "the home of the first vernacular literature written in medieval Europe" or otherwise stated literature written in a language which was not the Church's official language. (Fortson, 2005, p.275) Fortson (2005) writes that the cultural hegemony of the English expanded and "reduced the number of Celtic speakers in Ireland and elsewhere in the British Isles." (p. 275) the same is stated to be true in France since Breton is spoken by British Celt descendents falls under the French cultural dominance.

II. From PIE to Celtic

Fortson (2005) writes that Celtic and Italic share several features which has led some scholars to state the claim that "the two branches formed an 'Italo-Celtic' subgroup of Indo-European" although this claim's validity is highly questioned and has been a source of debate for many decades. Fortson (2005) states that Celtic is a "centum branch, having merged the palatal velars with the ordinary velars." (p. 276) Stated to be lost was "*p in most positions." (Fortson, 2005, p. 276) Also lost were Laryngeals "except when vocalized, in which case they became *a as in Italic and some other branches." (Fortson, 2005, p.276) in regards to Resonants, Fortson (2005) states that the nonsyllabic resonants stayed unchanged except for final *-m, which became -- n in Gaulish and Insular Celtic." (Fortson, 2005, p. 276) additionally stated is that a difficult domain of Celtic phonology is that of the syllabic liquids "because of their multiple outcomes." (Fortson, 2005, p.27) the IE vowel system is stated by Fortson (2005) to remain "largely unchanged. The main early shift was made by *o (long o) which became *u (long u) in final syllables." (Fortson, 2005, p. 276)

Most of the verbal formation of PIE are stated by Fortson (2005) to "survive into Celtic in one form or another, including athematic verbs, aorists, perfects, thematic subjunctives, and middles." (p. 277) Reported to have disappeared are "the operative...as have participles" although it is stated that some old participles are preserved vestigially as nouns, such as Olr. Carae 'friend' from the present participle *karant -- 'loving'." (Fortson, 2005, p. 277) Also lost were dual verb endings.

III. Two Branches of Insular Celtic

Fortson (2005) writes that Insular Celtic is comprised by two subbranches: (1) Goidelic and (2) Brittonic. (p.280) Goidelic is stated to contain "Old Irish and its descents: Irish Gaelic, Scots Gaelic, and Manx." (Fortson, 2005, p.280) Brittonic (Brythonic) is stated to contain "welsh, Breton, Cornish and perhaps the language of the Picts." (Fortson, 2005, p.280) Both Goidelic and Brittonic are referred to quite often as 'Q-Celtic' and 'P-Celtic' due to the "respective treatment of the PIE labiovelars: Goidelic turned the labiovelars into velars, while Brittonic turned them into labials." (Fortson, 2005, p.280) Continental Celtic languages are stated to appear the same on a basic level as other old Indo-European languages while Insular Celtic and specifically Irish and Welsh "look bizarre when compared to languages like Greek and Latin" stated to be due primarily to "a massive set of sound changes that occurred in rather quick succession over the course of a few centuries." (Fortson, 2005, p.280)

IV. Requirements for Proper Subclassification of Languages

The work of Tristram (2007) entitled: "The Celtic Languages in Contact" states that proper subclassification of languages which belong to a single branch of a language family requires knowing "not only which isoglosses they share, but also whether those isoglosses represent shared innovations, rather than archaisms, and also whether they are exclusive" or even extinct language branches. Furthermore "the exclusive shared innovations must not be the result of language contact occurring after the initial separation of the subclassified languages." (Tristram, 2007, p.93)

Tristram writes that the genetic subclassification of the Celtic languages has not fully been determined because of the fact that "Gaulish, Lepontic, and Celtiberian are not attested well enough to clarify their relations to the Insular Celtic (IC) languages as well as the fact "that it is unknown which shared innovations of IC are inherited from a putative common IC protolanguage and which are more likely to be the result of later language contacts." (p.94) Tristram questions whether there ever was a period in Insular Celtic language history in which the languages spoken in sociolinguistic conditions were "favorable to the creation of language areas." (2007, p.94)

Tristram reports that two factors facilitate the areal spread of contact-induced language changes which has been revealed in a comparative analysis and are as follows: (1) widespread bilingualism or multilingualism with regular patterns of exogamy between groups in contact; and (2) the absence of sharp sociolinguistic division between high and low varieties of the language in contact. (2007, p.95)

Tristram writes that the "sociolinguistic situations in which languages are in contact are likely to converge structurally are not necessarily the same as those in which large-scale borrowing of lexical material takes place." (2007, p. 94) it is acknowledged that there are many loan words from British into Goidelic and that this is a mutual loaning of words between the two.

Tristram questions whether any phonological and grammatical features that Goidelic and British share can be determined to have resulted from language contact following the two branches being initially separated and states that answering this question requires establishing whether it "can be demonstrated that the British and Goidelic acquired some common phonological and grammatical features after they had already developed as clearly different languages (or groups of closely related languages)..." (2007, p.95) According to Tristram "this can be done if one can reconstruct a reliable relative chronology of linguistic developments for both British and Goidelic." (2007, p.97) in fact, Tristram holds that if it can be demonstrated that intensive borrowing of structural features occurred between the branches of Insular Celtic "then all common features of British and Goidelic are just as likely to have developed through contact, as they are likely to have been inherited." (2007, p.97)

In the Goidelic language it is stated that the articulation of "stressed short mid-vowels (e and o) is raised to I and u respectively, if there was a high vowel (i or u) in the following syllable, as in Lat. cocina (with a long I pronunciation) > *kogina > *kugina > Olr. Cuicenn "kitchen." This change is stated to be "attested in some Ogam monuments." (p.98) it is stated that the I and u in Goidelic are lowered to e… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

?

Compare the Four Ordering Options

  1. 1.Buy this paper with your credit card or cash balance at PayPal.  Within 10 hours, we'll send the Microsoft Word file to the email address on your PayPal account.
  2. 2.Same as #1, but we will also remove the paper from our site for 30 days!
  3. 3.Need this paper immediately?  Want to individually download any of our 175,000+ exclusive, private, non-plagiarized papers for 30 days?  It takes only 2 minutes to subscribe and get instant access!
  4. 4.One of our highly experienced experts will write a brand new, 100% unique paper matching the exact specifications and topic that you provide!  You'll be the only person on the planet to receive the one-of-a-kind paper that we write for you!  Use code "Save10" to save 10% on your 1st order!

1.  Buy the full, 9-page paper:  $24.68

or

2.  Buy & remove for 30 days:  $38.47

or

3.  Monthly access to 175,000 papers

After paying, this link will download any paper(s).

or

4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

History of English Thesis


Linguistic Analysis of Word Order in Zulu Applied Linguistics Essay


Second Language Oral Production in High School Within the Context of CLIL Research Proposal


Extinct Languages Term Paper


Language Is the Perfect Instrument of Empire Term Paper


View 1,000+ other related papers  >>

Cite This Thesis:

APA Format

Linguistic History of the Insular Celtic Language Family and Proto.  (2009, August 5).  Retrieved December 14, 2018, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/linguistic-history-insular-celtic-language/5629

MLA Format

"Linguistic History of the Insular Celtic Language Family and Proto."  5 August 2009.  Web.  14 December 2018. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/linguistic-history-insular-celtic-language/5629>.

Chicago Format

"Linguistic History of the Insular Celtic Language Family and Proto."  Essaytown.com.  August 5, 2009.  Accessed December 14, 2018.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/linguistic-history-insular-celtic-language/5629.