Research Paper: Managing Diversity

Pages: 8 (2551 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 6  ·  Topic: Business - Management  ·  Buy This Paper


[. . .] Firms need to study how to manage diversity in the working environment to be solid in the future. Lamentably, there is no single formula for triumph. It relies fundamentally on the supervisor's capacity to understand the diversity as a thorough process of establishing an inclusive working environment (Paludi, 2012).

When making a solid diverse workforce, a successful manager may also concentrate on consciousness. Both administrators and partners need to be perceptive to their individual awareness. Consequently, firms must improve, actualize, and uphold continuous training because one-day sessions of training cannot change individuals' conducts. Administrators must also comprehend that fairness is possibly not equity. There are dependably exceptions to the principle. Managing diversity supersedes equivalent work opportunity and governmental policy regarding minorities in society (Albrecht, 2011). Chiefs may also anticipate that change will be slow but opt to support it. An alternate indispensable necessity when managing diversity is fostering a "protected" place for partners to communicate. Social teams and business groups, where each part must listen and have the opportunity to talk, are exceptional approaches to develop dialogues. Effective managers must actualize policies like coaching projects to give partners access to data and opportunities. Additionally, associates may not be denied the valuable and basic feedback for looking into successes and mistakes.

Workforce Diversity and Organizational Outcomes

A diverse workforce may enhance the client demand for identifying items and services. Asset-based key hypothesis predicts that firms with comprehensive cultural diversity can replicate various advantages and have sophisticated incomparable social assets. Federal records demonstrated that the 1992 rate of the representation of ladies managers in the biggest U.S. firms was positively identified with firm performance (return on assets and return of equity). The impact continued even in the wake of regulating for development in assets. Catalyst (2004) led an investigation of linkages between the sex differing qualities of top administration and business execution in Fortune 500 organizations. In the wake of regulating for size and industry, the study indicated that firms with higher top administration gender diversity had 35% higher profit for value and 34% higher aggregate return on shareholders compared to different firms (Mor-Barak, 2011). A huge multi-employer field study on the impacts of race and sex distinctions on a team and organizational execution shows the imperativeness of cross level and time lag impacts within firms. The exploration was directed at four major U.S. firms that were pioneers in supporting workforce diversity.

The researchers inferred that there were few immediate impacts of workforce diversity on organizational execution. Studies progressively recommend that the relationship between the presence of a diverse workforce and organizational performance may be a basic immediate positive or negative relationship. Rather, the relationship may rely on the method used including growth and innovation. A later review of over 500 banks discovered that those with additional social diversity and a development technique encountered higher equity return and net income for every worker, in respect to companies with a differing workforce and a no-development or downsizing method. Richard and associates (2010) resurveyed a subset of this example some years later, and discovered a moderate impact: workforce racial diversity notably enhanced execution when the firm accompanied an innovative mechanism.

A reversed U-molded association between gender structure and execution might differ by industry. Depending on a few national datasets, they discovered that the expansion in the representation of the ladies is linked with perceptual productivity measures for every worker and benefit just up to the point when equivalent extent of occupations are held by men and ladies -- no higher. Richard et al. (2009) cross-sectional studies contain a large portion of the literature on organizational results. Diversity must be part of a company's key business objective. A program focusing on diversity cannot completely succeed assuming that it is a separate system comparative to conventional Affirmative Action. The goals of diversity must be connected to business objectives, not simply achieving Affirmative Action legitimate prerequisites. Diversity must be focused on inside as well as ought to be a huge part of outer effort programs that recognize the organization as a multicultural leader and active in societal and community issues. Diversity must be a super ordinate objective instead of an objective credited to individual teams


Diversity has drawn individuals of different and similar backgrounds in one boat. In the current dynamic environment, it will be critical to stay informed concerning the development of diversity for the overall benefit of our social order. The life cycle of diversity spills out of assimilation and the golden rule to the process of managing diversity. The mix of similitude and distinctions to establish an adaptable, responsive, and more profitable workforce has taken a stab at the liability of strained relations along ethnic, racial and gender lines. Shockingly, it is my conviction that these strained relations will proceed into the 21st century until individuals feel regarded and equivalent to each other (Jackson, 2012).

Diversity management is a manifestation of human resource management. It addresses the numerous ways representatives are distinctive. A diverse workforce is an impression of an altering marketplace and the world. Differing work groups carry high quality to companies. Regarding distinctive distinctions will profit the working environment by making a competitive advantage and expanding organizational productivity. Diversity management profits employees by making a reasonable and safe environment where every human being can access and challenges. Tools for management in a diverse workforce ought to be utilized to teach every human being about diversity and related issues, incorporating laws and regulations. Evidently, working environments are made up of differing cultures, so organizations need to study how to adjust to be successful.


Albrecht, M.H. (2011). International HRM: Managing diversity in the workplace. Oxford [u.a.: Blackwell.

Cornelius, N. (2012). Building workplace equality: Ethics, diversity and inclusion. London: Thomson Learning.

Dansby, M.R., Stewart, J.B., & Webb, S.C. (2011). Managing diversity in the military: Research perspectives from the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Jackson, S.E. (2012). Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives. New York: Guilford Press.

Konrad, A.M. (2006). Handbook of workplace diversity. London [u.a.: Sage Publ.

Mor-Barak, M.E. (2011). Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Paludi, M.A. (2012). Managing diversity in today's workplace: Strategies for employees and employers. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.

Prasad, P. (2007). Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 8-page paper:  $28.88


2.  Buy + remove from all search engines
(Google, Yahoo, Bing) for 30 days:  $38.88


3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)


4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

Managing Diversity in the Workplace Valuing Term Paper

Workplace Diversity: Managing Research Proposal

Diversity Action Plan Essay

Managing in an Inclusive Environment Diversity Term Paper

Diversity Training This Report Is a Quick Term Paper

View 1,000+ other related papers  >>

Cite This Research Paper:

APA Format

Managing Diversity.  (2013, September 26).  Retrieved July 23, 2019, from

MLA Format

"Managing Diversity."  26 September 2013.  Web.  23 July 2019. <>.

Chicago Format

"Managing Diversity."  September 26, 2013.  Accessed July 23, 2019.