Research Paper: Motivates People or Corporations

Pages: 11 (3638 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 11  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Criminal Justice  ·  Buy This Paper

SAMPLE EXCERPT:

[. . .] e., rebuilding the fundamental structure of institutionalization). The most important tool in this case may be the obligation of exterior endorsements and supports. These work in conjunction to create a superior configuration of self-interest and communal tasks or roles, not just by reconfiguring exterior motivations to support conformity and harmony, but to design them flexibly enough to decrease the intensity of anti-social choices from the individuals (Mclean and Elkind, 2004).

This assessment that was largely prominent at the beginning in laying the fundamentals of American sociology has numerous significant effects. The very first is it explains crime as a kind of deviance, instead of like a mere malfunction of mechanism structure. Hence, the effort to view the foundations of crime concentrates on the malfunction of the phenomenon of social control -- breakdowns which are, obviously, interdependent, because the primary instrument of social control or exterior endorsements also puts forth an aspect of socialization. This perspective also indicates that 'moral' and 'legal' standards inside a society can be seen on the continuum, the major dissimilarity being basically the fact that the former are imposed through what exactly are, in different levels, informal social endorsements; on the other hand, the latter are imposed while using the government or state's influence (Vogel, 2005).

This is actually the universal theoretical structure assumed through established view of the overwhelmingly high percentage of criminologists. The idea of 'rational choice' structures and methods to criminology are also formed on the differences of this very perception. The intricate difficulties emerge when we take this structure beyond mere rational choices. Using this structure towards the description and justification of the reasoning of crime works out to be harder than originally believed, and lots of premature assumptions about what causes crime switched to being mere false beliefs. Crime is broadly recognized to symbolize some type of deviance, but it's not completely obvious oftentimes where the exact initiation of deviance occurs. Hence, logically, before searching into what causes crime, the initial step is always to know what precise type of deviance precedes it. Hence, it is clear to understand that the motivations to commit crimes can be understood to broadly encompass aspects of: flawed character, greed and irregular values (Vogel, 2005). They are talked about at length below:

Character

It's broadly thought among the masses that criminal deviance is because of some malfunction of childhood socialization. Based on this folk perception, crooks do not have or do not listen to their conscience, and have sociopathic inclinations more so than the average human being. This folk perception also suggests that the criminal don't view themselves to be worthy or capable of getting what they want by doing what's right. Thus criminal conduct is described as a result of some defect within the individual personality (Webley and much more, 2003).

The issue with this particular theory is it over-generalizes in ways that are not always strongly supported through the relevant data and evidence. Malfunctions of social control or aspects of socialization do, obviously, occur, and sociopathic tendencies are really a genuine aspect that defines character flaws in criminals. On the other hand, the overwhelmingly high percentage of criminal are not influenced or afflicted either. Indeed, it's exactly the ordinariness of white-collar crooks that brought about some serious resturtcuing of ideas and principles among the criminologists within the first few decades of the 20th century from the Victorian look and perception of criminality, which regarded the criminals as heritably, emotionally and mentally substandard. In support of this, Edwin Sutherland asserted that 'businessmen are generally not poor, are not feebleminded, do not lack organized recreational facilities, and do not suffer from the other social and personal pathologies' (as cited in Heath, 2008). A particular area of white collar crooks might be more egoistic and careless compared to the norm or masses of criminals, but just about all fall inside the selection of what's believed to be mentally proficient. Also, a similarly high percentage of criminals are practically incompetent. There's no specific mental trait or meticulous behaviour/habit that they all share, nor can there be any characteristic or group of characteristics that distinguish them in a significant way from the non-criminals (Webley and much more, 2003).

Social researchers have gathered substantial evidence to exhibit the folk idea of an individual's character has a small percentage of influence or none whatsoever on the predictive worth when it involves identifying the prospect of ethical and unethical behaviour, even though the overall situational inclinations and aspects have a very important role to play and a high level of influence (Doris, 2002, pp. 30-60; Wilson, 2002).

The concept that crooks are afflicted by some kind of character fault also serves the key purpose of forgiving many institutions associated with accountability for that demeanour of the people. Based on the well-liked perception, admiration for social anticipation, whether lawful or ethical, is one thing that's trained mainly in your home, refined through suitable childcare practices. Hence, It is also important to note here that ethics training in academic institutes are an absolutely futile exercise, due to the fact students are entirely socialized when they reach these institutions, and so their characters are already framed hence teachers can have little influence in their structure (Heath, 2006-2007).

Greed

There's no denying that the huge percentage of white collar crimes is motivated in what is extensively known as the pecuniary motivations. Typically, people who commit work crimes are trying to find easy and quick ways to enrich their personal lives, just like firms involved in acts of corporate crime wish to increase their financial standings and overall profits. Furthermore, obviously, because most individuals would prefer more income to less, there's an attraction to think that this fundamental incentive is exactly what supports criminal behaviour and inclinations. Naturally, the sheer existence of the pecuniary motivation isn't enough to describe criminal conduct, because there is a huge percentage of individuals, who confront such motivations frequently but don't make use of the occasion to commit crimes. Greed is most influential in these situations. While everybody enjoys having extra money at their disposal, many people appear to love it more strongly. Thus it might be logical to conclude that, within the situation of white collar crooks, the concentration of their love or hunger for money simply exceeds the different incentives that encourage adherence to what is right and the law (Heath, 2006-2007).

Greed provides a more conceivable reason for work crime, but even in a developed country like the United States the image is very complex. Frequently it's not the need for gain that inspires white collar crooks, but instead a powerful aversion to deficits (there's a highly-recorded asymmetry in the domain of criminal behaviour psychology between the way people treat deficits and gains). This really is reflected in the truth that crime appears to become more widespread in firms which are doing poorly compared to firms which are succeeding. Many white collar crooks are people who end up feeling extremely financially "squeezed" in some manner. In such instances, it seems to be that fear, desperation or apprehension instead of greed that play the roles of the dominant incentives for criminal inclinations. Another large amount of crime seems to become connected with rising anticipation, when actual profits fall somewhat behind the anticipated ones. Within this situation again, it's not exactly greed that's carrying out the criminal inclinations of an individual, but instead a feeling of entitlement that evolves and then consequently frustrates (Heath, 2008).

These criminal act motivations are very common and globally prevalant - certainly, too common and standardized to function as a helpful reason or logic for criminal inclinations or behaviour. Despite the fact that criminal inclination is definitely an appearance of universal requirements and principles, it's not described by individuals' them, as all form of non-criminal way of conduct and mannerisms are definitely an appearance of those identical needs and values. Quite simply, if greed coupled with chance really triggered crime in a considerable sense, then there will be a much more elevated level of successful criminal activities, due to that the corporate world provides numerous opportunities for white collar crimes and the fact that greed is omnipresent like a human incentive (Heath, 2006; 2007).

Values

Among the qualities collectively felt through the previous two folk ideas of criminality is the facts that they focus entirely upon the tendency of people, serving as people, to engage in criminal activities. Nevertheless, white-collar crime, much like street crime, comes with an imperative social dimension. When the individualistic approach were experienced to be correct, the other would anticipate finding a reasonably random allocation of white collar crime throughout various industries from the economy, based upon where people with poor character or an extreme degree of greed were employed. Yet, what you find rather are extremely… [END OF PREVIEW]

People Management and Human Resource Essay


People Management to Strategic Human Resource Essay


Internship Report: Crowley Maritime Corporation (Cmc) Research Proposal


Mcdonald's Corporation How Recent Economic Trends Essay


Corporations Send Out Messages Dissertation


View 999 other related papers  >>

Cite This Research Paper:

APA Format

Motivates People or Corporations.  (2011, May 26).  Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/motivates-people-corporations/2147380

MLA Format

"Motivates People or Corporations."  26 May 2011.  Web.  20 September 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/motivates-people-corporations/2147380>.

Chicago Format

"Motivates People or Corporations."  Essaytown.com.  May 26, 2011.  Accessed September 20, 2019.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/motivates-people-corporations/2147380.