NATO's Controversial Relationship in Afghanistan With the EU and Russia Research Paper

Pages: 5 (1442 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: ≈ 11  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Terrorism

NATO's Controversial Relationship in Afghanistan with the EU and Russia

The 2001 U.S. intervention in Afghanistan generated much controversy, with some of the major powers expressing reservation regarding the political and ethical reason for military intrusion in the Middle East. The European Union and Russia were particularly expected to get actively involved in the matter and in spite of the fact that the two communities were initially skeptical and appeared to be reluctant to support the U.S., they both joined the Northern American power. Debates emerged as a result of the limited support the war received from the general public and because the U.S. continued fighting even with its frequent claims to stop the conflict.

The 9/11 terrorist attacks and the subsequent military intervention in Afghanistan marked the beginning of the new era in international relations. To a certain extent, the World Trade Center events can be considered to be a result of the unipolar character dominating world affairs ever since the Soviet Union's collapse. While the terrorist attacks severely damaged society as a whole, they also brought advantages through the fact that world superpowers were enabled to cooperate. The European Union and Russia are believed to have gotten actively involved in supporting the U.S. principally because of the interest they had in fighting terrorism.Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Research Paper on NATO's Controversial Relationship in Afghanistan With the EU and Russia Assignment

The European Union assisted the U.S. In the Afghanistan Intervention by signing a series of agreements. Through these treaties, the two communities could "facilitate access to information and the exchange of personal data and strengthen operational links between investigative and law enforcement agencies" (Duffy, 133). With the U.K. being one of the main supporters of the U.S. In the Afghanistan invasion, it became obvious that the European Union was sympathetic as regards the matter. The U.K. is an influential member in the E.U. And by motivating that all countries should be equally concerned about putting an end to terrorism, the country virtually persuaded other European nations in supporting the war. "The unprecedented unity following the September 11 attacks translated into either open or tacit support for military action in Afghanistan" (Duffy, 186). While some states expressed no interest in joining the conflict, they nonetheless did so by allowing NATO military forces to use their airspace or by presenting armed forces with logistical guidance. Russia was among the first countries to support the U.S. In its endeavor to end terrorism by commencing Operation Enduring Freedom.

Tensions in Moscow and London were critical even prior to the 9/11 attacks, considering that the terrorist factor was also present in these territories (even with the fact that none of them had suffered losses that could be compared to aftermath of the World Trade Center events). The U.S.'s decision to go to war can be considered to have been somewhat beneficial for the European Union and Russia, given that they could exploit the situation in an attempt to deal with terrorist threats "at home." Vladimir Putin, Russia's president at the time, employed a realist tactic in joining the war against who stood as a threat to society, admitting that he was also interested in starting a serious anti-terrorist campaign on its own territories and abroad.

Operation Enduring Freedom was basically a product of the cooperation between the U.S., the E.U., and Russia. America's allies volunteered to assist the country in removing the Al Qaeda-supported government in Afghanistan. These three forces collaborated in invading Afghanistan and installing a democratic form of government in the country, with the purpose of eradicating terrorist convictions from the territory. The coalition was perceived as a relationship between some of the most influential countries in an attempt to guarantee the well-being of the civilized world. It was virtually impossible for the E.U. not to consider the role that it had in the overall state of affairs, with European authorities being aware that terrorist cells were located all across the continent, especially given that the World Trade Center events were presumably planned in Germany.

There was however a series of divergences between the EU and the U.S. As regards the strategy employed by NATO in fighting terrorism. The UK for example was uncertain if overthrowing the Afghan government would actually have a beneficial effect in the overall mission of destroying Al Qaeda. In spite of the support the country gave to the U.S. In this situation, it was… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (5 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

NATO's New Threat Assessments Asymmetric Threats and Global Terrorism Essay

Afghanistan the Current Situation Essay

NATO and the European Union the Cold Term Paper

NATO the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Term Paper

Relationship of Internship to Course Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "NATO's Controversial Relationship in Afghanistan With the EU and Russia" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

NATO's Controversial Relationship in Afghanistan With the EU and Russia.  (2010, November 8).  Retrieved September 22, 2020, from

MLA Format

"NATO's Controversial Relationship in Afghanistan With the EU and Russia."  8 November 2010.  Web.  22 September 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"NATO's Controversial Relationship in Afghanistan With the EU and Russia."  November 8, 2010.  Accessed September 22, 2020.