Neo-Orthodoxy: Rejection of Dogma in Religion Essay

Pages: 5 (1861 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 4  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Mythology - Religion

Bultmann caused a stir when he insisted that the "facts concerning the historical Jesus" are not as relevant to Christians as confronting "the Christ in the present"; in other words, faith is not about simply knowing and accepting historical facts, but rather, faith is one's "personal response" to how Christ is viewed in the context of modern life (Grenz, 88). This is very valid -- especially in the context of today -- because guiding one's life by the words in the Bible is like taking a trip with an outdated map. Modern society is changing and evolving and forward-thinking people are attempting to keep up with those changes while still maintaining an ethical outlook. In that sense, much of the Bible (especially the Old Testament) is simply not relevant. Slavery is acceptable in the Old Testament, for example, but it certainly is no longer tolerated in 2014.

In conclusion, the neo-orthodoxy movement was not an exact discipline followed in lockstep by the theologians referenced in this paper. The movement has had an enormous impact on the Christian community and its leadership. And each of the theologians' ideas and philosophies are valid in the context of which they were made; and all the ideas presented by these four theologians have value for the present and for the future, in particular for believers who wish to understand how Christian thought and theology has evolved over the years.

Works Cited

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty. (2010). Emil Brunner. Retrieved September 10, 2014, from

Grenz, S.J., and Olson, R.E. (2010). 20th-Century Theology: God & the World in a Transitional Age. Downer's Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Hall, D.J. (1998). Remembered Voices: Reclaiming the Legacy of "neo-orthodoxy."

Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

Hart, J.W. (2007). Karl Barth vs. Emil Brunner: The Formation and Dissolution of a Theological Alliance, 1916-1936. Lake George, NY: EQ Publishing.

Essay on Neo-Orthodoxy: Rejection of Dogma in Religion Assignment

McCollough, T.E. (1963). Reinhold Niebuhr and Karl Barth on the Relevance of Theology.

The Journal of Religion, 43(1).

McGrath, A.E. (2013). Emil Brunner: A Reappraisal. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Moseley, C. (2013). Nations and Nationalism in the Theology of Karl… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (5 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Neo-Confucianism in South Korea Term Paper

New Religious of My Own Term Paper

Neo-Aristotelian Criticism Essay

Was Confucianism a Religion or Philosophy? Research Paper

How Did Chinese Religion and Culture Influence the Religious History of Korea and Japan? Essay

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Neo-Orthodoxy: Rejection of Dogma in Religion" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Neo-Orthodoxy: Rejection of Dogma in Religion.  (2014, September 10).  Retrieved May 30, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Neo-Orthodoxy: Rejection of Dogma in Religion."  10 September 2014.  Web.  30 May 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Neo-Orthodoxy: Rejection of Dogma in Religion."  September 10, 2014.  Accessed May 30, 2020.