Organizational Strategic Plan Review Essay

Pages: 8 (2461 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 5  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Teaching

More noticeably, a weakness in the plan comes immediately into view in noting the massive lack of funding that the school has in place to set forth its academic improvement goals. While this facet of the plan is likely one that is universal across the state of Florida, and across the country for that matter, the plan itself does little to spell out the budgetary plans of the school, focusing not clearly enough on how funds will be utilized and distributed, but too much on the fact that funding is lacking and budgetary cuts must be made in many areas of the school system.

Recommendations for Modification

Currently, the Ruth K. Broad Bay Harbor K-8 Center ranks 191/1943 in Florida Elementary School rankings in FCAT Reading and FCAT Math scores, which proves that the school has found a solid base in maintaining continual success and high educational standards (FDOE, 2011, p.1). However, improvements can always stand to be made. In beginning the modification of the current plan in hopes of revamping its basis and pushing for future success, certain areas of function should be focused on: school culture; academic success for all students; technology, facility management and planning; and staff and faculty. In developing a strategic plan for improvement that is both comprehensive and inclusive, and in developing this plan with consistent input from administrators, faculty, staff, and parents, the development of the future plan has the capacity to fully satisfy each individual who will come in contact with its respective use.Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Essay on Organizational Strategic Plan Review the Assignment

In Florida, the existence of Student Advisory Councils (SACs), which are purposed to assist in the preparation and monitoring of the School Improvement Plan (SIP), are set in place to guide the school's action toward improving student achievement (Greenlee, 2009, p. 230). To accomplish that objective, councils decide how school improvement funds are spent, decide jointly with how faculty how school recognition funds are spend, assist principals with the school budget and perform functions as prescribed by regulations of their local boards (Fege, 2000, p. 44). In understanding this facet, along with the requirement in Florida that elected parent and community members exceed the number of school employees involved in these SACs, much more focus and specifics in the school's improvement plan surrounding parental involvement, the role of the SAC and budgetary limitations must be included in order to ensure that any of the proposed improvements have a real chance at full implementation and success (Leithwood and Menzes, 2008, p. 329).

Additionally, as federal policies have mandated the reporting of state and institutional date on teacher candidates and that all teachers meet state requirements for being high qualified in the subjects they teach, in addition the student assessments, teacher performance testing in the areas of content, knowledge, teaching knowledge, and actual teaching assessments can be set in place within the standards of the strategic improvement plan in a manner that ensures that not only students are held accountable for the improvements or lack thereof that stem from the initiative and its implementation (Luster, 2010, p.14). In including this provision, faculty will better understand what is expected of them throughout the implementation process of the plan rather than exist in a state of uncertainty as previously mentioned in the section focusing on plan weaknesses. While such a standard does not exist within Florida at a state-mandated level, the implementation of such a standard within the Ruth K. Broad Bay Harbor K-8 Center can serve as a standard of excellence in this area, ensuring parents and onlookers that no rock has been left unturned in ensuring the success of such programs.

Finally, as technology has proven to serve as the basis for many school improvements, the plan at hand must incorporate standards for implementation, utilization, and improvements that are more expansive than those included in the current plan. While the improvement plan at hand makes consistent mention of the utilization of technology within many facets and areas of daily school functions, the improvement plan lacks an expansive and comprehensive description of the ways in which the school's technology will be improved within the school-year at hand. While again, it must be noted that budgetary implications may be the cause for the plan's lacking focus on technology improvements, certain tactics can be implemented within the plan to ensure that the school's technology features remain utilized and up-to-date regardless of budgetary restrictions.

With innumerable technology grants available to schools across the United States, the utilization of such grants as well as their standards for full-utilization of resources would allow the school to move forward in terms of success and technological-knowledge despite lacking resources. The ability to move forward in terms of technological knowledge cannot be hindered by budgetary constraints, and in developing a plan to not only acquire new resources but fully utilize those that already exist within the school, a more well-developed plan for improvement can be facilitated.


Fege, A. (2000). From fund raising to hell raising: new roles for parents. Educational Leadership, 57.7: pp. 39-43. Web. Retrieved from: ProQuest Databse. Accessed on 23 November 2011.

Florida Department of Education. (2011). Florida elementary school rankings: 2010-

2011. National Center for Education Statistics, 2011.1: pp. 1-9. Web. Retrieved from: LexisNexis. Accessed on 23 November 2011.

Greenlee, B. (2009). When school advisory councils decide: spending choices for school improvement. Planning and Changing, 38.3-4: pp. 222-251. Web. Retrieved from: ProQuest Database. Accessed on 23 November 2011.

Leithwood, K. And Menzes, T. (2008). Forms and effects of school-based management: a review. Educational Policy, 12.3: pp. 325-346. Web. Retrieved from: ProQuest Database. Accessed on 23 November 2011.

Luster, J. (2010). Why states should require a teaching performance… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (8 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Strategic Plan Validation of the Organizational Vision Essay

Strategic Plan for Sony Corporation Term Paper

Organizational Technology Plan for Dell Term Paper

Annual Reports vs. Strategic Plans Essay

Kudler Fine Foods Strategic Plan Business Plan

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Organizational Strategic Plan Review" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Organizational Strategic Plan Review.  (2011, November 23).  Retrieved March 30, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Organizational Strategic Plan Review."  23 November 2011.  Web.  30 March 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Organizational Strategic Plan Review."  November 23, 2011.  Accessed March 30, 2020.