Organizational Theories as a Product Term Paper

Pages: 5 (1428 words)  ·  Style: MLA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 7  ·  File: .docx  ·  Topic: Business - Management

¶ … Organizational Theories as a Product of an Evolutionary Process

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
In analyzing how contemporary organization theories are a product of an evolutionary process, the progression of theories can't be viewed in isolation, they must be seen as influenced by the broader demographic, economic, sociological and more immediate knowledge management and managerial trends within organizations. The progression of top-down organizational structures that were heavily influenced by both the military chain-of-command concepts (Mutch, pp. 751-769) and the bureaucratic approach to management have dramatically changed as organizational theories have transitioned over the last century. From theories that were centered purely on the creation of closed-loop systems that had as their catalyst military chains of command to the more contemporary theories today that stress agility and responsiveness, organizational theories have gone through significant change over the last century. The intent of this paper is to illustrate through example how contemporary organizational theories are have gone through an evolutionary process that has shifted the focus of control from the organizational structure itself to the value and contribution of the individual. Compounding this transition from being centered on the structure of the organization to the value of the contributor has been the need for greater levels of agility and quickness of response to market conditions. This major aspect of organizational theory evolution is accounted for both in the shift to organizations competing on knowledge and the use of information systems technologies to manage this asset effectively (Gupta, Tesluk, Taylor, pp. 885-897)

Organizational Theories' Evolutionary Pattern of Growth

Term Paper on Organizational Theories as a Product of an Assignment

Creating organizational structures that preserved and promoted authority and a strict chain-of-command that ensured continuity of the organization first and foremost, military-influenced organizational theories served as the foundation for bureaucracies being created. The bureaucratic organizational theory evolved, with well-defined functions, structures, roles and closed-loop systems that also reflected the current reasoning of the time that organizational theories needed to first concentrate on efficiency and operations research precision of process above all (Davis, 2006, pp. 114-118). Organizational theories from this period began with a high level of specialization and division of labor, highly centralized authority, a very clear delineation of line vs. staff functions, and very narrow spans of control (Jacobides, 2006, p. 151). From the influence of operations research, specifically time-and-motion studies and the discovery of economies of scale as it relates to human productivity, organizational theories evolved into a scientific management revolution. An obsession with all aspects of operations research took hold and efficiency became paramount, further accentuating the narrow spans of control and fueling the development of more refined scientific management organizational theories. These theories collectively also aligned well with the concentration on a capital-intensive focus in the majority of industries at the time, where the physical plant and equipment was seen as the most critical asset there was in organizations. Organizational theories then further reinforced the efficient use of these assets over the value of intellectual human capital. Differentiation was achieve through economies of scale and by driving down labor hours; the use of labor was incidental and during the era of scientific management organization theories, relatively unskilled. All of these factors contributed to an evolution of organizational theories to concentrate on the elements of operations research over and above the balance of motivational theories that would later emerge.

As organizations began to realize that the majority of their differentiation was being achieved not necessarily by the pure efficiency of their plant and equipment but by the insights their employees were providing, in addition to the reduction in production efficiencies as a competitive advantage and the rise of creativity and innovation in products, which necessitated organizational theories that concentrated more on managing people and less about deriving higher levels of asset utilization and performance. Characteristics of this phase of evolution of organizational theory is most marked by the participation of both line and staff functions in decision-making and discussions, a gradual decentralization of authority, divisions of labor by product instead of by functional area, all of which necessitates a wide and flat organizational structure. Business models had to this point progressed from being purely focused on production as the basis of value generation to being more customer- and market-driven, hence the division of labor by product lines aligned to specific markets. The emergence of organizational theories became more oriented… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (5 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Organizational Theory and Behaviour Essay

Organizational Theory: Strengths and Weaknesses Research Proposal

Organizational Theory 'There Is a Thin Line Term Paper

Organization Theory and Behavior Term Paper

Diagnostic Analysis Organizational Research Proposal

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Organizational Theories as a Product" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Organizational Theories as a Product.  (2008, January 16).  Retrieved August 8, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Organizational Theories as a Product."  16 January 2008.  Web.  8 August 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Organizational Theories as a Product."  January 16, 2008.  Accessed August 8, 2020.