Palliative Care and Communication Essay

Pages: 10 (3534 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: ≈ 12  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Psychology

Palliative Care and Communication

User, patient and public involvement have all gained high priority in public policy and services. The Calman Hine Report in 1995 paved the way for user involvement in palliative care by recommending that cancer ser- vices should be patient-centered (Department of Health 1995). The National Health Service Cancer Plan (Ramsey & Blieszner, 1999) encourages user involvement in the context of recognizing the quality of cancer services as a national priority. There is a broader emphasis on patient/carer experiences and satisfaction with services.

The UK government has established a Commission on Patient and Public Involvement for the NHS, headed by a 'participation czar'. In 2003, the government established a major NHS consultation - Choice, Responsiveness and Equity in the NHS and Social Care - which placed a specific emphasis on patient and user involvement and which directly involved service users in eight officially appointed task groups, including one focusing on long-term conditions, which addressed palliative care issues (Aday, 2005).Get full Download Microsoft Word File access
for only $8.97.

Essay on Palliative Care and Communication Assignment

These developments have taken place within a wider context of government emphasis on user involvement and service users being at the centre of health and social care services. This has encouraged the development of user groups and organizations across a wide range of health and social care service users, including, notably, disabled people, mental health service users/survivors, older people, people living with cancer, people with learning difficulties and people living with HIV / AIDS. There are, however, some significant and interesting contradictions about user involvement in palliative care. Palliative care, notably as embodied in the hospice movement, has always emphasized the centrality of the patient or service user and its own 'holistic' approach to provision and practice. It has highlighted its concern with the individual's physical, social, psycho- logical and spiritual needs. It has historically placed an emphasis on 'voice and choice', concepts which have subsequently gained a prominent place in the health and care lexicon. As one of the founding figures of the hospice movement, Dame Cicely Saunders said that one of its principal and explicit aims was to provide a 'voice for the voiceless' (Henry, et al. 2005).

Nevertheless, it can be argued that hospice and palliative care have been slow to address 'user involvement'. Except for the development of patient satisfaction surveys, whose helpfulness as a form of user involvement is open to question, it was not until the late 1990s that user involvement really emerged as an issue in palliative care, with the beginning of public discussion, organized events, publications and the commissioning of research (Chadiha, 2000). By contrast, user involvement was a legislative requirement in social care from the early 1990s and participatory developments in that field can be traced to the early 1980s. Similarly, schemes for user involvement in mental health services were under development from the mid-1980s, and in the field of disability from the 1970s (Aday, 2005). The pressures against participation Because no research studies have been undertaken, it is possible only to speculate why hospice and palliative care may have come late to user involvement. One explanation might be the feeling that 'we are doing it anyway' - the sense that patients are involved routinely - following from the long-standing commitments in this field to listen to the patient/service user and to act as an advocate for them. However, offering a voice is not the same as accessing people's own voice.

Another explanation may be that, while multidisciplinary and committed to a holistic way of working, palliative care has tended to be medically led. Health services more generally have been slower to address issues of participation than social care services. The latter are now acknowledged to have had a pioneering role in this field. But this still would not explain why palliative care came later to participation than some other areas of health specialist, for example mental health. It is the third possible explanation that seems the most likely. Hospice and palliative care services work with two groups of people who are seen as particularly vulnerable in society. These are people with life-limiting ill- nesses who may be facing death and people who are either facing bereavement or have been bereaved.

Thus palliative care service users are at very difficult times in their lives, having to cope with massive change, fears for the future and possibly financial uncertainty. For some it may mean having little time and feeling weak and very ill; for others, coping with loss and perhaps the prospect of loneliness and isolation. It would not be surprising if workers and agencies were reluctant to place additional burdens on service users who can already be seen to have other difficulties and preoccupations (Baarsen & Broese van Groenou, 2001). Furthermore, death, dying and loss are still areas of taboo in western societies. Workers and managers do express particular concerns about involving palliative care patients and service users. Issues are raised about how meaningful such involvement may be at the 'end-of-life stage' of people's illness.

There has also been a significantly pessimistic strand in academic and research discussions of user involvement in palliative care. Fears have been raised about such involvement being stressful, unhelpful and coming to be seen as an obligation (Henry, et al. 2005). These are important issues and need to be addressed. So far, however, they have not followed from research findings and there is no evidence base for them. Research work so far has also been based on very small numbers. Initial experience in contrast, where attempts have been made to involve service users with careful planning and preparation, there has been an enthusiastic response. This has included people with different conditions, who are very ill and with little time to live. There have been some significant recent developments. In 1999, a national seminar on improving quality and developing user involvement in palliative care was held (Ramsey & Blieszner, 1999). This was jointly organized with current palliative care service users and attended by a majority of service users. User involvement was made the subject of the National Council Annual Awards scheme in 2001.

This led to the establishment of a User Involvement Panel, hosted by Help the Hospices and composed of palliative care service users and others. The Panel developed and ran a series of educational regional seminars on user involvement, culminating in the first national conference on this subject held in 2003 (Zink, et al. 2003). Progress in developing user involvement in palliative care is undoubtedly being made. However, these events have also highlighted, through contact with a wide range of managers, practitioners and service users that it is still at an early stage, patchy in implementation and raising a number of concerns and uncertainties from service providers. At the same time, most of the large, independent palliative care and related organizations, including Marie Curie, Macmillan Cancer Relief, Help the Hospices, the National Hospice Council and Sue Ryder Care, have variously developed their own policies and initiatives for user involvement. It is important at this stage neither to over- or understate the progress that has been made (Lalive et al. 2003).

What is likely to be most helpful is some critical consideration of major concerns being raised in relation to this issue. The aim in this chapter is to explore user involvement in palliative care in the broader context of theoretical and practical developments, drawing on a wider range of policy areas. People's feelings about involvement need to be put into context. There is no question that participation can be a negative and unhelpful activity (Henry, et al. 2005). Arnstein's development of a ladder of participation has long highlighted this (Ramsey & Blieszner, 1999). Her ladder descended from 'citizen power', through 'placation' to 'manipulation'. But such deficiencies are less to do with the inherent nature of participation itself and more to do with what participation constitutes and what purpose it serves in any given situation. Palliative care service users who get involved generally seem to value the activity. However, only a small proportion of such service users have responded to invitations to get involved.

But this is true of most groups - both of service users and of other people. We are likely to need to look to broader structural issues for an understanding of this, including the fact that we live in a representative, not participatory, democracy, where many people do not expect and are not accustomed to 'getting involved' in formal public policy or state-related activities. Equally, reservations have traditionally been raised about the involvement of many 'vulnerable' groups. This has frequently been the case in relation to people with learning difficulties, particularly those seen as having 'profound' or 'multiple handicaps' or who did not communicate verbally. But there are few groups this has not been raised in relation to during the course of the modern development of participation policy and practice, including children and young people, mental health service users / survivors and others who have experienced long-term institutionalization (Wu & Schimmele, 2005). Concerns have been raised that such groups would… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (10 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Psychological Barriers of the Client and Family Members Facing Death and Dying Term Paper

Rural Healthcare Term Paper

Developing the Evidence Matrix for Communication Quality Improvement Among Physician and Staff Research Paper

End-Of-Life Issues: Futile Care Research Paper

Ethical Analysis Looking Into Palliative Care Strategy Research Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Palliative Care and Communication" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Palliative Care and Communication.  (2012, February 27).  Retrieved October 22, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Palliative Care and Communication."  27 February 2012.  Web.  22 October 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Palliative Care and Communication."  February 27, 2012.  Accessed October 22, 2020.