Patient Satisfaction in Quality Term Paper

Pages: 5 (1419 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: ≈ 3  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Healthcare

Outline: Comparison of Studies

I. General subject area

A. Gender and Patient Satisfaction in Managed Care: definition

B. Stakeholder Perceptions of Quality in Managed Care Plans: definition

C. Two Steps to Enhance Managed Care Quality: definition of steps

II. Comparison of methodologies

A. Aggregate data

B. Focus groups, mail survey

C. Compiling published information

III. Literature review critique

B. As a tool to construct format of focus groups

IV. Compare probable reliability of findings

A. Assess amount of information in A and B. articles; assess source of information in C.

V. Assess need for further study

A. Should similar studies be carried out in a for-profit setting?

B. Is there a way to address the preferences/perceptions of all three stakeholder groups to serve all equally well?

C. Is there any possibility these new demands will change, and if so, how and when?

VI. Conclusion

VII. References

VIII. Exhibits


Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
The subject of managed care is not only in the news, but also in the minds of all the stakeholders in health care: health care consumers, physicians and other medical personnel, and employers from hospitals to managed care facilities. Three recent articles have attempted to shed some light on the various factors involved in either the perception of the quality of an MCO by those stakeholder groups (or in one case, part of a single stakeholder group) and on the quality of MCOs; in one case, commentary is made also on the cost of new programs designed ostensibly to enhance both the quality and perception of quality of MCOs. This one is, however, more an attempt to explain facts and processes already known and established than to discover new and helpful information, although it does offer helpful information.


Term Paper on Patient Satisfaction in Quality of Assignment

Each of these studies has a different objective, although each is allied to the improvement of the perception of MCOs. The study by Weisman et al. concerns determining the variables that affect women patients' perceptions of the quality of managed care, while the Thompson study has as its objective determining much the same thing concerning the perceptions of three sets of stakeholders: patients, physicians and employers. The Thompson study is more simply presented and the information is less difficult to assess, although the researcher did new original research while the first study simply used available data obtained from another source. The Grimaldi article did not so much use data as retell information regarding programs already constructed in its single objective of explaining the demands and results of two new mandates that are supposed to enhance managed care quality.


In Weisman et al., the subjects were respondents to an NCQA survey, and included 97,873 men and women over the age of 18. The Thonpson study used a much smaller sample consisting of focus groups all drawn from a homogeneous base in a single state. The Grimaldi article reported on ways to assess various effects of MCO quality measures on various populations rather than conducting any original research as the second study, or assessing the findings of research as the first study had done.


The Weisman et al. study took as its hypothesis the idea that the differences between men's and women's perceptions of health care were different, but minor. On the other hand, the hypothesis underlying the Thompson study was that three stakeholder groups would have very different perceptions, or perhaps more accurately, desires concerning what constitutes quality in an MCO. The Grimaldi paper had relatively little in the way of a hypothesis, although the paper concluded that the new programs described would result in administrative costs for MCOs hat would balloon rapidly and lead to various fee increases, although it seemed that the author didn't believe the quality results to be gained from his hypothesis would be worth the additional expense.

Works Cited

Grimaldi, Paul L., Ph.D. "Two steps to enhance managed care quality." Nursing Management, August, 1998.

Thompson, Jon M. "Stakeholder perceptions of quality in managed care plans."?

Weisman, Carol S. et al. "Gender and patient satisfaction in managed care plans: Analysis of the 1999 HEDIS/CAHPS 2.0H Adult Survey."? [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (5 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Quality Improvement Regarding Pain Control in Orthopedic Patients Research Paper

Quality of Life the Impact of Social Essay

Patient Safety Culture Article Review

Quality Improvement Project Essay

Quality Improvement in Health Care Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Patient Satisfaction in Quality" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Patient Satisfaction in Quality.  (2004, June 9).  Retrieved September 28, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Patient Satisfaction in Quality."  9 June 2004.  Web.  28 September 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Patient Satisfaction in Quality."  June 9, 2004.  Accessed September 28, 2020.