Personal Philosophy of Life Applied Essay

Pages: 5 (1484 words)  ·  Style: MLA  ·  Bibliography Sources: ≈ 3  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Healthcare

¶ … Personal Philosophy of Life Applied to My Profession

The Intersection of Human Rights and Modern Healthcare

My philosophy of the equal rights of all persons applies directly to the current national controversy over national healthcare reform. Because this relates to my profession, it is a topic that interests me personally. My position on the various issues themselves is a function of my philosophical beliefs about what is fair and equitable in American society. Specifically, my philosophical perspective addresses the inequity of allowing unrestricted profit from healthcare services and health insurance and the entire fee-for-service model of medical reimbursement upon which American healthcare is dependent.

The Fundamental Ethical Problem with For-Profit Healthcare Services

Profiting from Pain and Disability

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
In principle, I believe that the entire concept of profiting from illness and disability contradicts what is ethical and morally right in modern human societies. Certainly, medical doctors deserve to be compensated for the amount of time, effort, and commitment involved in becoming qualified in their profession. On the other hand, there is a significant difference between what is fair compensation that genuinely reflects the social contribution of becoming a doctor, nurse, or other medical service provider and the completely unrestricted compensation that also allows some specialist medical doctors to earn many hundreds of times the salary of ordinary people like most of their patients. According to my philosophy of human rights in relation relative needs, essential services such as medical services should be subject to some sort of regulation that limits the maximum amount of profit earned from treating human illness and disease.

Health Insurance

Essay on Personal Philosophy of Life Applied to My Assignment

Currently, the annual cost of healthcare in the United States is almost two and a half billion dollars annually (Reid, 2009). Two-thirds of that staggering amount represents the direct cost of all of the medical services provided to patients; the entire remainder, representing approximately $800 million, is the added cost associated with the for-profit healthcare insurance industry that actually adds nothing in the way of medical services (Kennedy, 2006; Reid, 2009). The amount of money at issue would probably go further toward improving American healthcare delivery to those in need of medical care that they cannot afford than most of the reforms currently being debated in Washington.

Just as in the case of the professionals who work so hard to earn medical degrees and fulfill grueling internships to become doctors, those who provide medical insurance also have a right to fair compensation. However, from a basic ethical and moral perspective that presumes that all citizens have an equal right to essential services, there is no justification for allowing unrestricted profits from insuring medical risks. There is nothing necessarily immoral about for-profit health insurance, provided there is appropriate regulation and a maximum limit to the amount of profit in relation to the value of the services provided.

In that respect, the primary moral and ethical problem with the current for-profit health insurance industry is that there is absolutely no way to justify costs amounting to thirty percent of the cost of medical services for providing purely administrative services. That is particularly true in light of the fact that even Medicare, a federal program that is severely under-funded and with a history of administrative problems manages to accomplish the same functions as private-sector health insurers for approximately one or two percent of the total cost of the medical services they administrate instead of one-third of those costs (Kennedy, 2006; Reid, 2009).

Political Lobbying

In general, the entire concept of special interest group lobbying in Washington on behalf of private industry is a fundamental moral and ethical problem with respect to the principles of democracy and equal justice for all. This mechanism allows private sector industries (and other well funded entities) to exert influence that causes elected officials to support (or oppose) laws and public policies in the interest of those entities instead of equally in the interest of the general public.

This practice has traditional been justified by characterizing the process as involving nothing more than pay for access to public officials in order to make policy presentations in person instead of relying on the same ability (at least in theory) that individual citizens have to contact their elected representatives through traditional correspondence. In fact, there are tremendous advantages to lobbying public officials in person and it is largely a fiction that lobbying is not a form of legalized bribery. To the extent that is true, the entire process… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (5 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Personal Philosophy of Knowledge Research Proposal

Personal Philosophy of Nursing Research Proposal

Personal Philosophy of Nursing Research Paper

Personal Philosophy / Supervision Portfolio and Supervision Forms Term Paper

Theory Application and My Philosophy Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Personal Philosophy of Life Applied" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Personal Philosophy of Life Applied.  (2009, December 10).  Retrieved June 2, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Personal Philosophy of Life Applied."  10 December 2009.  Web.  2 June 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Personal Philosophy of Life Applied."  December 10, 2009.  Accessed June 2, 2020.