Personality Impressions Term Paper

Pages: 4 (1195 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 0  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Education - Mathematics

Burkard, Alan W. And Knox, Sarah (2004). Effect of therapist color blindness on empathy and attributions in cross-cultural counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51:4, 387-397.

Whether research investigations are designed on the basis of an experimental, descriptive, historical, or case study format there must exist a clearly defined research question which informs the reader as to the specific intent of the research undertaken. When the research design is experimental or descriptive there must follow a well-formulated testable null hypothesis. Should these two research tenets not be in place then the research is said to be ad hoc and of little useful propose with respect to the validity and reliability of content knowledge. The present article reviewed and authored by Burkard and Knox (2004) can be best described as ad hoc research and did not follow the best-fit practice for effective research. The reasons for this summary statement is based upon the following reasons:Get full Download Microsoft Word File access
for only $8.97.

Term Paper on Personality Impressions Assignment

research question is to be presented at the beginning of a research investigation and if designed as an experimental of descriptive study a testable null hypothesis (es) follows. Buckard and Knox did not formally present a research question and the hypotheses presented were not only directional and non-testable (i.e., null form) but also highly biased as well: "...we hypothesized that those therapists were higher in color blindness racial attitudes..." "...we predicted that therapists' color blindness would be related to...." "..we predicted therapists' color blind racial attitudes would..." (p. 389). Continuing one step further, the research investigators failed to even alert the reader as to the research problem even though they presented a great deal of information pertaining to the overall area of study. At no time is a research investigator permitted to pre-formulate a direction that a sequence of events might take. All that a research is permitted to do is hypothesize that no differences, effects, or relationships will be uncovered as a result of the investigation. The reason being is that without a testable null hypothesis a research investigator cannot explain why something some thing did happen, and not why something did not happen. Therefore a research investigator must always begin with a statement (null hypothesis) that something will not happen.

With respect to the sample used in the study the authors failed to alert the reader as to the randomness of selection. When samples are chosen on the basis of non-randomization, the statistical tool chosen to analyze the day must be "re-fitted" to accommodate for non-randomization of selection.

The data analysis discussed in the report (p. 391-393) makes reference to an ANOVA and Pearson "r" coefficient analysis. These two particular statistical tools are employed to determine effects/differences and relationships between and amongst the variables under investigation. As there exists no rationale for seeking differences or effects the use of the ANOVA technique is circumspect. For there to exist legitimacy for the use of the ANOVA technique the reader should have been presented a testable null hypothesis stating effects and/or differences between and amongst the variables identified. In addition the research investigators did not identify any nested and/or intervening variables that might possibly impact upon their study. Such variables might have been in the form of gender, time in practice, practice demographics, practitioner ethnicity/race, and socio-economic status of client.

Other mishaps with respect to the reviewed study include the lack of identifying the independent variables (even tough the authors make mention of such variables but without explanation and definition on page 391); an adequate description of the IRI and MCSDS validity coefficients; a rationale for investigating a culturally sensitive area with measurement instruments… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Impressions of War the Most Vivid Imagine Essay

Personality and Communication Affect on Supervision Term Paper

Personality Assessment Instruments Thesis

Personality Assessment ID 69079 Personality Assessments Question Term Paper

Assessment Instruments Personality Assessment Inventory PAI Essay

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Personality Impressions" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Personality Impressions.  (2004, December 5).  Retrieved January 24, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Personality Impressions."  5 December 2004.  Web.  24 January 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Personality Impressions."  December 5, 2004.  Accessed January 24, 2021.