Philippine Nursing Licensure Examination in June 2006 Research Proposal

Pages: 10 (3107 words)  ·  Style: APA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 10  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Health - Nursing

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
Philippine Nursing Licensure Examination in June 2006

REPUTATION AND THE FUTURE AT STAKE

The Philippine Nursing Law

Republic Act 9173, or the Philippine Nursing Act of 2002, provides for a more responsive nursing profession. Article IV on examination and registration states that all applicants for license to pass nursing are required to pass a written examination (Congress of the Philippines, 2002). The Board of Nursing, or BON, of the Professional Regulation Commission or PRC shall determine the scope of the examination. The scope shall include the objectives of the curriculum, broad areas f nursing and related disciplines and competencies (Congress of the Philippines).

According to the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration, 7,768 nurses left the country in 2005 and 12,822 in 2001 to work overseas (Rodis, 2007). They find competition with Philippine doctors who study to become nurses and get higher-paying jobs abroad. A typical doctor in a government hospital earns only $446 a month while a job as a nurse abroad can pay $8,000.00 (Rodis). This is the context in which the 2006 Philippine Licensure exam scandal occurred.

The 2006 Leakage Scandal Timeline

June 11-12 - On these days, 42,000 nursing graduates took the exam, conducted by the PRC (GMA News Research, 2006). Of this number, 17,800 passed.

June 21 -- Some examinees filed a complaint that answers to 500 actual questions to Tests III and V were distributed to other examinees at three nursing review centers (GMA News Research, 2006). These were the Gapuz, INRESS, and Pentagon nursing review centers, two of which were located in Baguio City. Some examinees filed a complaint against former Board of Nursing members who supplied the actual test questions to students of the mentioned review centers. They said that the leakage stained the outcome of the exam and questioned the qualification of passers. In response, the PRC and the BON conducted an investigation. They found that two former members of the Board copied and distributed test question manuscript to enrolled students at the three review centers before the actual exam. One of them claimed that she accidentally left copies in a copier shop in Baguio City while photocopying her 500 questions. They were also accused of receiving bribes from the review centers for the questions and their answers. Of the 500 "raw" questions, 20 were for Test III and 90 were for Test V (GMA News Research).

The Culprits and their Crime

These two former Board members were Anesia Buenafe-Dionisio and Virginia Diolola-Madeja (Torres, 2007). On June 1, 2007, the Ombudsman filed criminal charges against them for violating Section 15a of Republic Act 8981 and Republic Act 3019. Republic 8981 is an Act Modernizing the Professional Regulation Commission. Republic Act 3019 is the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. The Board also filed charges against Ray Gapuz, owner of the Gapuz Nursing Review Center. Madeja was the assigned examiner for Test III on Medical Surgery Nursing while Dionisio was assigned for Test V on Psychistric Mental Health. The complaint filed said that the examinees enrolled at the RA Gapuz Review Center in Baguio City finished the exam much earlier than others. Investigation showed that keywords to 56 questions in Madeja's manuscript were written down and distributed to enrollees at the Gapuz Review Center. Of these 56, 23 were actually included in Test III. Of the 100 questions actually asked in Test V, 90 were leaked out by Dionisio in handwritten notes and computer printouts to enrollees at the Gapuz Review Center in Baguio City, the Institute for Review and Special Studies or INRESS in Manila and other review centers elsewhere in the country. The National Bureau of Investigation or NBI also found Madeja and Dionisio as responsible for the leaks. The accused failed to overturn the charge that the only sources of those questions leaked out were those who prepared and submitted these questions. Investigators did not believe Dionisio's claim that she had lost her manuscript or that of Madeja that the computer shop she frequented reproduced her manuscript (Torres).

July 17 - In response to the problem, the PRC passed Resolution number 31 (Rodis, 2007; Marcelo, 2002) The Resolution invalidated the 20 leaked questions and recomputed the combined scores in the un-affected Tests I, II and IV and averaged them to make a retake unnecessary. It then announced that 17,781 out of 42,000 examinees had passed. The Resolution elicited loud objections from nursing students, their families, nursing schools and organizations. Those who favored a retake argued that it was the only way to erase the shame created by the leakage on the nursing profession. On the other hand, those who opposed it complained of the added expenses and delay in issuance of licenses it incurred (Rodis, Marcelo)..

July 26 - The University of Santo Tomas' College of Nursing Faculty Association, through its president Rene Luis Tadle, urged the PRC to defer the oath-taking of those announced exam passers. At first, the Office of the President ordered a retake of the exams.

August 15-16 and 18- the PRC and the BON announced that the oath-taking would proceed for those who passed the recomputed scheme. Tired of government inaction, the UST College of Nursing Group petitioned the Court of Appeals to stop the implementation of Resolution number 31 and order a retake. The Court of Appeals issued a temporary restraining order against the implementation of Resolution number 31 and the scheduled oath-taking (GMA News Research, 2006; Marcelo).

DOJ Indictments

August 23 - A Presidential Task Force on the Licensure Exam was formed for the retake of the affected Tests III and V (GMA News Research, 2006). In the meantime, the Department of Justice indicted the owners of the two nursing review centers for violating Republic Act 8981 (Canlas, 2007). The Department found probable cause against the owners of the centers for giving handouts of tests questions to examinees, which came out in the exam. The accused owners were Ricarte Gapuz, Elena Gapuz-Altajeros and Jonna Bucudall of the Gapuz Review Center and George Cordero of the INRESS Review Center. The contents of the handouts given by the Gapuz Review Center to its enrollees were identical to the test questions, which later came out in the exam. The Department resolution also said that Jonna Bacud, a scholar and drill master of the Gapuz Review Center, would testify against her employer. She said that the test questions circulated between Baguio and Manila. The Department likewise added the name of another respondent, George Cordero, as an accomplice. A witness said Cordero assured him that 100 questions out of the 500 in psychiatric nursing would surely come out in the exam (Canlas).

August 28 and September 27 -- Philippine President Gloria ordered the revamp of the Board of Nursing and expressed favor for a retake (GMA News Research, 2006; Marcelo, 2002).

October 13 and 26 - the Court of Appeals voided Resolution 31 and ordered a retake of the exam by those whose names were merely added to the list of successful examinees. Un-affected successful examinees could go ahead with the oath-taking and secure their licenses. It later ruled that no these un-affected and successful examinees did not have legal impediments to the oath-taking (GMA News Research).

The Court of Appeals ordered the 1,687 enrollees of the review centers to retake the exam (Marcelo, 2002; Canlas, 2007). But those who passed and did not attend these centers would be given their licenses immediately. The decision for a partial retake was heavily criticized as something that would not redeem the credibility of Filipino nurses. The president of the UST College of Nursing Faculty Association said that the indictments were insufficient to recover lost international reputation of Filipino nurses. Rene Luis Tadle was also the spokesman of the UST Nursing Leakage Ad Hoc Committee and one of those who exposed the 2006 leakage. He emphasized that there should be concerted effort in assuring the prosecution of the violators in order to restore trust in the reputation of Filipino nurses (Marcelo, Canlas).

CGFNS Sanction

February 14, 2007 - the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools or CGFNS announced that Filipino nursing graduates involved in the scandal would not be eligible for a VisaScreen Certificate (Pinoy Abroad, 2007). It required the examinees to re-take and pass Tests III and V in order to qualify for the Certificate, which is a requirement for nursing or related jobs in the U.S. It announced that the decision to disqualify the examinees was reached after careful deliberation and in pursuit of the critical mission of CGFNS. Upon learning about the leakage, the Commission sent a fact-finding mission to the Philippines in September 2006. The Commission found that the competencies of passing examinees who received licenses became questionable on account of the irregularity. It reasoned that the integrity of foreign licensing systems could not be compromised. Such integrity affects the health and safety of patients in the U.S. This is a primary criterion in evaluating candidates under the U.S. immigration law, according to the Commission. The CGFNS is… [END OF PREVIEW]

Two Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (10 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Qualitative Nursing Term Paper


Nursing What Effect Does Simulation Lab Literature Review


Nurse Practitioner Specialty Certifications Assessment


Nursing the Differences Between a Lpn Term Paper


Nurse Health Habits Effect Hospital Environment Research Paper


View 1,000+ other related papers  >>

Cite This Research Proposal:

APA Format

Philippine Nursing Licensure Examination in June 2006.  (2009, July 11).  Retrieved January 24, 2020, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/philippine-nursing-licensure-examination/555597

MLA Format

"Philippine Nursing Licensure Examination in June 2006."  11 July 2009.  Web.  24 January 2020. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/philippine-nursing-licensure-examination/555597>.

Chicago Format

"Philippine Nursing Licensure Examination in June 2006."  Essaytown.com.  July 11, 2009.  Accessed January 24, 2020.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/philippine-nursing-licensure-examination/555597.