Political Framing in the US Term Paper

Pages: 7 (2319 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 5  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Government

Although the street game seems significantly vicious, this research cannot ignore the significance of stage speech in illuminating on the nature of politics. Box-Steffensmeier (2012) classifies Obama-Romney framing with a clear empathy for Romney side. The game frame emphasized the candidates' debate preparation strategies. In any case, the emphasis frames are treated as a contest against individuals and not a platform to present their ideologies. For instance, the announcement "Romney had to prepare harder for the debates than Obama" is a critical blow that seeks to explain that Romney was not prepared for the heat in the Oval Room. Conversely, Romney camp is responsive to the nature of criticism directed towards Romney as an individual. Romney is quick to bail himself out as an underdog who is not aware of the way forward when it comes to emphasis debates. In fact, Romney is quoted to having said "The President is obviously a very eloquent gifted speaker -- he'll do just fine"

The mainstream media plays a decisive role conceiving and leading a given debate. In any case, the debate is structurally developed to generate new-ideas as especially those, which related to handling given situations. Sarah Palin presents a critical depiction in attempting to argue how emphasis politics is prepared to edge outrivaling clamps.


ComparisonBuy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Term Paper on Political Framing in the US Assignment

The depiction of an individual / group depends on the accessibility and the applicability of different dimensions and emphasis to a given issue or certain value of frames. In comparison, of the two frames, it is good to note that the each of the frame seeks to analyze an individual personality, sociality, and administrative ability. In fact, both frames are entirely based on the aspect of criticism. Criticism is structurally directed towards achieving a given set of answers. Secondly, it is good to understand the complexity of the two frames and the role of media in bridging the gap between them. In 2012, Obama camp applied the emphatic claim to argue out a given justification. In their phrases, it was clear that the camp was least interested in preparing for an emphasis debate since they had pressing issues ahead with LGBT presenting part of that "seriousness" republican side. Now the aspect of issues is introduced, apparently, there was a parallel claiming arguing that Romney was not in a technical capacity to handle issues at the oval room. As a result, the two camps constructed an equivalency frame (issue based) to arrive at a given direction.


The nature of frames differs heavily in how they are depicted. In this regard, it is good to note that equivalency frames have their differential effects in relation to individual bases. The evaluation of the nature of dimension is based on the rate and how each framing is applied. While equivalency frame applies a structural qualitative analysis on an individual / party contribution, the emphasis frame is largely propaganda based. In relation to Obama and Romney contest, the two frames were applied significantly alongside each other. However, the nature of the deployment heavily differed. In fact, the difference was extended to the stage level. At the stage level, the equivalency frame expected candidates to wear official presentation -- that is in this case is suits. Inversely, the emphasis frame was demonstrated by the wear of casual wear, which is in this case not recognized as an official wear. Therefore, in an analysis, the two frames were applied alongside each to explain vital information regarding the nature of each candidate. The frames were instrumental in conveying the differences between the two leading participants.


In summary, the two frames feed from each other. In this case, the operation of one frame requires the availability of the seconding frame. The two frames are instrumental in aiding the dominating party to attack opponent socially and professionally. The study has also attempted to depict that the two frames similarities are based on the ability of each frame to inspire the audience that the opponent is not fit to be an office bearer. The study has also clarified frames are well communicated by use of body language. In the termination, it is prudent to note that frames are collective political ideology since the audience can assess the candidate capability of handling administrative heat through frames.


Box-Steffensemeier, J.M., & Schier, S.E. (2013). The American Elections of 2012. New York:


Callaghan, K., & Schnell, F. (2013). Framing American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

Ferraris, J.P. (2012). Obama 2012: For a Compassionate America. New York: Author House.

Harvey, A., & Feagin, J. (2013). Yes We Can?: White Racial Framing and the Obama

Presidency. New York: Routledge

Kenski, K., Hardy, B., & Jamieson, K.H. (2010). The Obama Victory: How Media, Money, and Message Shaped the 2008 Election. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grant, J.T., & Rudolph, T.J. (2004). Expression vs. equality. Columbus: Ohio State University


Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (7 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Barack Obama in Political Time Term Paper

Fifteen of His Book Arsenal of Democracy Journal

How Do the United States and Iran Demonize Each Other? Essay

Government the Diversionary Effects of War by US Presidents Term Paper

Why Is Culture a Political Issue? Essay

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Political Framing in the US" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Political Framing in the US.  (2014, April 14).  Retrieved September 26, 2020, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/political-framing/2308073

MLA Format

"Political Framing in the US."  14 April 2014.  Web.  26 September 2020. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/political-framing/2308073>.

Chicago Style

"Political Framing in the US."  Essaytown.com.  April 14, 2014.  Accessed September 26, 2020.