Post Tenure Review Research Proposal

Pages: 2 (791 words)  ·  Style: APA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 6  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Teaching

Tenure Biblio

Kratz, A.R. (2005). The effectiveness of post-tenure review practices in Texas graduate institutions as perceived by academic deans (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, TX.

This study identifies the main motivation and impetus behind post-tenure reviews as the maintenance of standards of quality in teaching positions, as is evidenced by a general consensus of professors and administrators at the several institutions discussed. External pressures regarding continued accountability are also cited as a primary reason such practices are undertaken. Different formats and delivery schedules of post-tenure reviews are reviewed for efficacy, and such reviews generally have very mixed results. The assertion that effective post-tenure review is enormously time consuming and expensive is commonly made.

Jaschik, S. (2009). Defeating post-tenure review. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from Inside Higher Ed. Web site:

The rejection of a post-tenure review process at the University of Maryland was met with dismay by students, who formed the loudest public voice in the matter. These students felt that post-tenure professors were less accessible and less present in their teaching than those who had yet to achieve tenure. Professors rejected the proposal, claiming that it placed the burden of the review on the professors, and thus undermined tenure, in addition to having a negative impact on teaching by demanding more of the professor's time be devoted to proving to a committee that they were effective in their positions.

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
McNeil, D. (1997, May 7). San Jose State University s97-5: Policy recommendation post-tenure review. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from San Jose State University. Website:

TOPIC: Research Proposal on Post Tenure Review Assignment

This document outlines a proposed plan for post-tenure review at San Jose State University in California. The review process as outlined is formative in nature, with input being drawn from a variety of sources including standard student opinion surveys distributed in each class, other signed documentation from students and colleagues, and a formal review with a committee consisting of the department chair and at least two other professors of higher rank than that being reviewed (except in the case of full professors). Review efficacy is not within the scope of this document, nor does it comment on general principles or motivations for post-tenure review.

Post-Tenure Review: An AAUP Response. (2006, October 26). Retrieved November 6, 2009, from American Association of University Professors Website:

Explicitly reaffirming and expanding upon the organization's stance against post-tenure reviews, especially… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (2 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Post Tenure Review Post-Tenure Review: Envisioned Research Essay

Tenure Mixed Methods Post-Tenure Review: Research Questions Dissertation

Post-Tenure Review: A Research Design Thesis

Post-Tenure Review Research: Ethical Concerns Thesis

Tenure and the Post-Tenure Review System Thesis

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Post Tenure Review" Research Proposal in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Post Tenure Review.  (2009, November 11).  Retrieved September 28, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Post Tenure Review."  11 November 2009.  Web.  28 September 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Post Tenure Review."  November 11, 2009.  Accessed September 28, 2021.