Pros and Cons of Roadway Congestion Pricing Term Paper

Pages: 12 (3087 words)  ·  Style: MLA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 10  ·  File: .docx  ·  Topic: Transportation

Public Policy

Variable Pricing as a Means for Controlling Urban Congestion: An Analysis of Data from London, Stockholm, and New York City

The Problem of Congestion

The myriad negative effects of persistent congestion


Fuel waste

Increased transit times

Added costs to goods and services

Why congestion continues despite increased expenditures on highway infrastructure

Traditional mitigation schemes are ineffective

More infrastructure will not alleviate congestion

Variable congestion pricing as a viable solution

Congestion pricing is technically feasible

Congestion pricing is economically viable

Congestion pricing faces political and public resistance

Case Studies of Existing and Proposed Variable Pricing Schemes to Alleviate the Problem of Urban Congestion

London: a system at work

Not a true variable pricing plan, but still functional

The effects of London system

The public's reaction to the pricing schedule

Stockholm: a seven-month experiment ready for implementation

The sophisticated system for controlling congestion

The public's mixed reaction

An experiment becomes the law of the land

New York City: public and political resistance

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77
The potential benefits of a congestion pricing scheme

The perceived problems with such a system

The possibility of a pricing scheme in NYC

Analysis and Conclusions on the Pros and Cons of Pricing Schemes for Controlling Roadway Congestion

Analysis of the Costs and Benefits

The public and private costs of roadway pricing

The benefits to the public


There is still significant public resistance to these kind of pricing schemes

Term Paper on Pros and Cons of Roadway Congestion Pricing Assignment

However, congestion continues to increase and pricing strategies offers a viable hope for control


Roadway congestion is a significant problem for nations with an active motorist population, especially in urban areas. Traditional efforts to combat congestion have typically focused on increasing capacity through increases in roadway infrastructure. Research has shown, however, that these methods are ultimately ineffective for controlling congestion and its associated ills. Economists have long seen the value in associating usage costs with roadways in order to control congestion and encourage more efficient resource use. With technology finally catching up to this ideal, roadway-pricing schemes are becoming more popular in cities throughout the world. A consideration of the pros and cons of pricing strategies implemented in London and Stockholm, and proposed in New York City, reveals that while there is still significant political and public resistance, the strategies are effective at achieving their stated goals.

Introduction: Why Congestion Exists Despite Highway Expansions

Congestion, both in urban centers and on connecting highways, has become a major problem for the transportation networks of cities throughout the world. In the world's major metropolises, the issue has become particularly acute, with congestion having profound negative effects on air quality, travel time, the cost of goods and services, and the general livability of cities. Congestion problems are literally becoming a liability for these cities. As the pressure of congestion increases, the capacity of a given city to function effectively is greatly diminished, resulting in hidden and overt costs for individuals, businesses, and public resources. The net effect, then, of congestion has been consistently deleterious.

In particular, congestion has been associated with a number of costs. These include reduced traveling speed, increased traveling time, less transportation reliability, increased fuel consumption, increased vehicle wear, increased air pollution, and general inconvenience. The costs of increased travel time and increased fuel consumption alone has been estimated to run in the hundreds of dollars per capita per year in the United States (Lindsey and Verhoef 1). For urban planners and transportation departments in the United States and in the world, congestion is a significant issue that has a direct impact on the lives and livelihoods of all residents.

Congestion has been traditionally treated as an issue of capacity. In other words, if congestion is too high the reason must be that the existing road infrastructure is not large enough to meet demand. While this is true to some extent, the end result of this attitude is induced demand. The perception that building more or better roadways can lessen congestion only leads to a still greater increase in congestion. Improved roads quickly translate into more traveling, diversion of vehicles from parallel routes, and similar effects. Empirical research on the subject reveals that induced demand actually nullifies any benefit that is initially attained through roadway investment. In the short-term infrastructure investments will lead to behavioral changes: people will shift from less used routes to new or improved routes and will increase time spent traveling. Over the long-term, infrastructure investments will cause structural changes such as population increases, business expansions or relocations, and general growth along the improved roadways (Cervaro 145-146). Efforts to alleviate congestion through investment to roadway infrastructure will ultimately backfire or, in a best-case scenario, produce no net gain.

As a solution to this significant issue, some policy-makers are turning to the possibility of variable roadway pricing to mitigate the negative effects of congestion. Roadway pricing is based on a simple economic principle that is already at work in a number of other industries. Consumers should pay directly for costs they impose on an existing system as an incentive for more efficient use of limited resources (Litman 1). This explanation sounds much more complicated than it actually is. Consider how variable pricing is used in other industries like airlines or hotels. Anyone would expect to pay more for a plane ticket or a hotel room around the holidays. Businesses deal with this increased strain on their limited resources by increasing prices so that consumers will make more efficient choices instead of simply flooding the system all at once. In roadway situations, it is no different. Space on roads is limited; therefore, associated usage with a variable price schedule would help decrease usage -- and congestion -- during peak demand periods.

Unfortunately, this simple economic principle has been difficult to implement in the past for two reasons. First, it hasn't been until recently that the available technology has made variable roadway pricing strategies a viable option. Only in the last few years has the array of available technology become sophisticated enough to make these economic strategies more than just academic. Second, public and political resistance to roadway pricing schemes, of any kind, has been high. Concerns regarding privacy, access, freedom, and unwillingness to pay have motivated the public to keep politicians from even entertaining such ideas. However, in recent years, congestion has become a large enough problem -- negatively affecting the livability of many cities -- that there has been increased public and political pressure to develop solutions. With the technology available for implementation, this change in political current means that variable pricing roadway strategies are likely to become more common (Hensher and Puckett 615-616).

The purpose of this study is to examine in some greater depth the dominant costs and benefits associated with roadway pricing strategies designed to alleviate congestion and mitigate the major negative effects of congestion. In order to do this, three situations will be evaluated: a functioning, if non-variable, program in London, an experiment in variable pricing in Stockholm, and a current debate in New York City. In each of these cases, the details of the proposed programs will be laid out, as well as the specific costs and benefits that can be directly associated with the programs. Ultimately, it will be clear that the economic and social benefits of these strategies are undeniable and the technology, while costly, is effective. The only major stumbling block is winning over public support for roadway pricing strategies.

Variable Pricing at Work in London, England

On February 17, 2003, the London Congestion Charging Scheme was enacted for a zone the encompassed the central London area. The initial charge to individuals was five pounds, or about $8, for the right to drive or park in the central London zone. Since the initial rollout, the price for a base license has been increased to eight pounds for that same right. Purchasing a license entitles an individual to park or drive through the central London area during the hours of 7AM until 6:30PM, Monday through Friday (Santos and Shaffer 164-5; Litman 2). During other times, off-peak periods, driving and parking in the central London zone is entirely free. While this is not a full variable pricing scheme -- which would correct for different congestion areas, for different times of the day, and for distances traveled -- the London plan does have the benefit of simplicity and relative ease of implementation.

London city officials decided to use middle-of-the-road technology to enforce this pricing scheme, known as automatic number plate recognition (ANPR). This technology visibly checks the license plates of cars passing into and out of specific tolling points that surround the central London zone. A computer records this number and then checks it against all payments made to the system during that day. Individuals who travel into London are required to pay without prompting the same day or in advance for the use of the roads in central London. Failure to do so will result in a fine being automatically issued to the individual who owns the car… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (12 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Pros & Cons of Inclusive Education Term Paper

Pros and Cons of Inclusions Term Paper

Pro-Or Con There Is a Revolutionary Change Term Paper

Abortion Pros and Cons Thesis

Pros and Cons of Immigration Reform Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Pros and Cons of Roadway Congestion Pricing" Term Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Pros and Cons of Roadway Congestion Pricing.  (2007, April 25).  Retrieved September 26, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Pros and Cons of Roadway Congestion Pricing."  25 April 2007.  Web.  26 September 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Pros and Cons of Roadway Congestion Pricing."  April 25, 2007.  Accessed September 26, 2020.