Multiple Chapters: Relationship Between Metacognition and Academic Achievement in College Students

Pages: 10 (3068 words)  ·  Style: APA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 15  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Teaching  ·  Buy This Paper

SAMPLE EXCERPT:

[. . .] Also, test performance was likewise connected with metacognitive regulation in that he was able to discover correlations among performance and global and local judgments.

Duffy and Meloth (2009) looked into metacognitive adjustment by calculating monitoring correctness at the local and global level on a sequence of exams that were multiple choice given as a part of a course that was a semester long. They were able to discover that monitoring correctness stayed stable throughout the semester in regards to the exam. They were able to find out that students were more right in their worldwide predictions than their local forecasts. They discovered that student performance on the tests was connected to local monitoring correctness.

Metacognitive Awareness Inventory

Schraw and Hartley (2006) were the ones that were able to put together the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) in order to evaluate metacognitive understanding and metacognitive control which they talk about to as the knowledge of cognition factor and the guideline of cognition issue. The MAI involved 62 questions extracting into these two constituents of metacognition. They found that there was strong support for the knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition components and that these two modules were linked as had been proposed in the study (Yanyan, 2010). Schraw and Moshman (1995) likewise assessed the convergent legitimacy of the MAI by equating MAI grades with other methods believed to be associated to metacognition for instance pretest monitoring capability, definite test performance and the aptitude to precisely monitor test presentation. They did not find a significant relationship with regard to monitoring correctness and the Multilevel Assessment Instrument or among pretest conclusions and checking correctness. They were able to find out that the knowledge of reasoning factor of the Multilevel Assessment Instrument was related to higher test performance and the regulation of cognition factor of the Multilevel Assessment Instrument was not. They also found that knowledge of cognition as measured by pretest judgments was related to the Multilevel Assessment Instrument. Pretest judgments were likewise connected definitely to test presentation. Yanyan (2010) using the Multilevel Assessment Instrument to define college student metacognitive awareness, discovered a significant association among the knowledge of cognition factor and the rule of cognition issue. They likewise were absorbed in whether the Multilevel Assessment Instrument would be connected with other events of academic achievement for instance SAT scores and high school average.

They were able to discover that there was no relation among scores on the Multilevel Assessment Instrument and procedures of academic achievement. They were surprised to discover a negative relationship among SAT math scores and the Multilevel Assessment Instrument results.

In all, the findings in the study reviewed above on the topic of the correlation of metacognition with academic and achievement events specify that when regulation of thought is measured by having students assess their performance on either a global or local level, regulation of thought is connected to performance on test, area detailed GPA scores and largely GPA scores (Schraw & Hartley, 2006).

It looks as if that when metacognition is measured through adjustment of performance measures there is maintenance for the association among metacognitive abilities and assesses of academic achievement. Awkwardly, determining monitoring ability and monitoring correctness at the global and local level to measure metacognitive knowledge and regulation skills is a labor intensive attempt.

This circumstance is particularly true for students who are evaluated in their actual college classes and not a laboratory or manufactured setting. Students watching their correctness on a global and local level must take the time to reply to the test questions and then give a response to how self-assured they were in regards to their performance taking place each question. This procedure can be a time overwhelming and perhaps demanding task for students even though taking tests that will count toward their end of course scores (Zulkiply, 2008). It is significant to measure students in a less disturbing method so as to ascertain their metacognitive consciousness and skill level. Furthermore, a less intrusive assessment for instance a questionnaire will permit instructors to rapidly recognize struggling students at the beginning and help them in developing operational metacognitive skills.

Gender differences in metacognitive skills

Prior research has shown changeable results regarding the differences on metacognitive skills among boys and girls. Some research makes the suggestion that there are differences concerning boys and girls' metacognitive skills, while others propose that these alterations are not important. On the other hand, steady research is needed concerning this subject ever since the answers of such studies could be used in educational practice. Their have been studies that an investigation into the potential Gender differences concerning the metacognitive abilities of 8th graders. For instance, 91 pupils from three schools in Romania were measured on their metacognitive skills, by using the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. The findings indicate that generally both girls and boys use their metacognitive skills in learning

(Ciascai & Lavinia, 2011).

Furthermore, the results indicate that there are important differences between boys and girls solely continuously the following dimensions: the awareness of performance therefore of one's will and effort, the insights concerning teachers prospects about learning, the use of previous knowledge in planning, problem-solving, knowledge about one's own intelligent weaknesses and strengths, the usage of various learning strategies and checking the learning procedure.

Relationship to Other Concepts

Investigators in cognitive psychology have connected metacognition to a quantity of other constructs, as well as metamemory, critical thinking, and incentive. For instance, meta-memory is thoroughly associated to metacognition, chiefly cognitive knowledge. Meta-memory is "information in regards to memory processes and fillings," and involves two constituents that carefully reflect the declarative and procedural features of cognitive knowledge (Sperling & Murphy, 2002). Variables, which parallel to declarative knowledge, allude to "obvious, conscious, factual knowledge that performance in a memory task is predisposed by an amount of dissimilar issues or variables" (p. 74). Sensitivity, which agrees to technical knowledge, is knowledge about when a specific memory strategy might be valuable. As said by Vrugt and Oort (2008) most developing lessons of metacognition have in point of fact concentrated on the construct of meta-memory, chiefly its procedural measurement.

Growth of Metacognition Over Time

Schraw (2001) characterizes expansion of metacognition as the actual continuing (and not always unidirectional) crusade to obtain better cognitive strategies to supplant incompetent ones. Several scholars have decided that metacognitive abilities appear to develop with age

(Vrugt & Oort, 2008). Schraw and Moshman (1995) postulate that metacognitive expansion profits in this way: cognitive knowledge performs first, with children as young as age 6 capable to imitate on the correctness of their reasoning, and merging of these services classically understandable by 8-10 years of age.

Aptitude to adjust cognition appears next, with intense developments in monitoring and regulation coming on the scene by 10-14 years of age in the method of planning. evaluation and monitoring of cognition are slower to grow and may stay unfinished in many adults and even during the time that they may enter college. Lastly, the construction of metacognitive philosophies appears last (if it even appears at all). These philosophies permit for the addition of cognitive regulation and cognitive knowledge.

Children impulsively create these theories as they come to replicate on their own learning and thinking. Metacognitive concepts tend to originate within a certain domain, and to progressively extend to other domains. These theories start as understood and informal, becoming more arranged and reinforced over time. By teenage years, most individuals make out that even experts can disagree on certain matters. At the moment, several fall away into multiplism (or whole relativism), where everything is particular, no principles can be tried, and all estimations are similarly right.

Reference:

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.

Ciascai, L., & Lavinia, H. (2011). Gender differences in metacognitive skills. A study of the 8th grade pupils in Romania. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology - ICEEPSY 2011 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 396 -- 401

Coutinho, S.A. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate~, 7(1), 39-47.

Cross, D.R. & Paris, S.G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.

Duffy, G.G., Miller, S., Parsons, S., & Meloth, M. (2009). Teachers as metacognitive professionals. In Douglas J. Hacker, John Dunlosky, & Arthur C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 240-256). New York, NY: Routledge.

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113 -- 125.

Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H.J. Hartman (Ed.). Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp.3-16). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review 7(4), 351 -- 371.

Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader… [END OF PREVIEW]

Four Different Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?

1.  Buy the full, 10-page paper:  $26.88

or

2.  Buy & remove for 30 days:  $38.47

or

3.  Access all 175,000+ papers:  $41.97/mo

(Already a member?  Click to download the paper!)

or

4.  Let us write a NEW paper for you!

Ask Us to Write a New Paper
Most popular!

Academic Reference Services Information Science Information Commons Research Proposal


Successful Steps to Transition Through Self-Advocacy and Self-Determination Thesis


Learning Theories Research Proposal


Language Acquisition Thesis


Vail (AZ) School District's Online Curriculum Resources Term Paper


View 23 other related papers  >>

Cite This Multiple Chapters:

APA Format

Relationship Between Metacognition and Academic Achievement in College Students.  (2014, March 31).  Retrieved April 20, 2019, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/relationship-metacognition-academic/7697002

MLA Format

"Relationship Between Metacognition and Academic Achievement in College Students."  31 March 2014.  Web.  20 April 2019. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/relationship-metacognition-academic/7697002>.

Chicago Format

"Relationship Between Metacognition and Academic Achievement in College Students."  Essaytown.com.  March 31, 2014.  Accessed April 20, 2019.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/relationship-metacognition-academic/7697002.