Sales Contracts and Products Liability Law Article Article Review

Pages: 2 (696 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 0  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Business - Advertising

Sales Contracts and Products Liability Law Article Review

O'Reilly, James T. (Summer 2003) "Product Recalls & the Third Restatement: Consumers Lose Twice from Defects in Products and in the Restatement Itself." The Memphis Law Review. Pp.1-6. Retrieved by FindArticles. Full Text Available at

This article demands more stringent and protective legislation for consumers regarding product recalls. A product recall is almost always designed to prevent a future injury from a product that is known or suspected to be harmful to future consumers. A product recall is the removal from the market of a product, including a consumer's home where necessary, that is suspected of posing an acute risk of injury to consumers because of manufacturing or design defect, or a lack of warning label. Currently, companies must recall a product if the product is in violation of current government regulations regarding consumer safety and also if a 'reasonable person' might see that the product would cause harm. If they do not, companies are legally liable for consumer injuries. The author belives that the law should be changed and companies must be liable and held responsible for recalling a product that harms consumers if the company had knowledge the product might cause harm, given their insider's greater knowledge of the product's design.

Legal IssueDownload full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!

Article Review on Sales Contracts and Products Liability Law Article Assignment

According to the author, the product recall provisions of the Restatement of Torts: Products Liability (Third Restatement) are dangerous to the health and security of the innocent consumer. (O'Reilly, 2003, p.1) "A refusal to protect the consumer from post-sale harm is reprehensible and the law should penalize such inactivity. The issue represents a classic case in which a tort remedy is needed to augment the deficient regulatory regime. A duty to protect consumers from known risks should be recognized in the recall context. Conventional negligence principles would serve the public far better than this new approach permitted under the Third Restatement." (O'Reilly, 2003, p.1) Currently, the law makes the company legally liable for harm to persons or property caused by the seller's failure to recall a product after the time of sale or distribution… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (2 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Corporate Civil Procedure and Constitutional Law Term Paper

Shipping Law Working for Peanuts: A Case Term Paper

Business Law Which Type of Contract Term Paper

Business Law - 6 Case Briefs Buckeye Research Proposal

International Sale of Goods Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Sales Contracts and Products Liability Law Article" Article Review in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Sales Contracts and Products Liability Law Article.  (2005, October 28).  Retrieved May 11, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Sales Contracts and Products Liability Law Article."  28 October 2005.  Web.  11 May 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Sales Contracts and Products Liability Law Article."  October 28, 2005.  Accessed May 11, 2021.