Literature Review Chapter: Shale Gas Analysis

Pages: 10 (3643 words)  ·  Style: Harvard  ·  Bibliography Sources: 20  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Energy  ·  Buy This Paper


[. . .] Evaluation of the potentialities of the shale rock is also done using the vitrinite reflectance test. Vitrinite reflectance provides valuable information on the maturity of the shale rock. The method operates on the premise of the reflectance of the kerogen that shows the maturation and the evolutionary age of the shale rock. It also relies on the fact that as the temperature of the parent rock increases, the hydrocarbon generation increases resulting in a change in the reflectance of the kerogen (Shebl et al., 2010).

According to Kinley et al., (2008), the programmed pyrolysis technique is also used to evaluate the potentialities of the shale rock. The process entails heating the shale rock at different temperatures (300 and 550 degree Celsius) to release the hydrocarbons it contains. Geologists measure the collected hydrocarbon for its hydrogen content that correlates with the availability of the shale gas in the rock. Well logs serve as a valuable source of information that can be used for the evaluation of the potentials of the shale rock to produce an adequate amount of shale gas. Logs provide information such as gamma activity that plays a central role in influencing the occurrence of shale gas in the shale rocks (Schenk, 2011).

As such, rocks that display high gamma value have a high content of kerogen, hence, suitable for providing an adequate amount of shale gas. Elemental Capture Spectroscopy also proves an effective technique for evaluating the potentials of the shale rocks. The technique incorporates the use of Platform Express integrated wireline logging tool that aids in the calculation of the gas saturation and its lithology in the parent shale rock. The geologists are able to compare the content of quartz, carbonate, and pyrite that influence the quality of the shale rock. Other methods of evaluating the potentials of the shale rock include basin inversion and paleogeography, stratigraphy, and in-depth analysis of the isopach maps (Bakshi, 2012).

How is shale gas stored in shale gas reservoirs?

Shale gas is stored in three different ways in the shale gas reservoirs. The ways in which it is stored include adsorbed/absorbed on the organics and minerals, free gas in the parent shale rock and dissolved in water. Adsorbed or absorbed shale gas refers to the gas that is attached to clays or organic matter. The very low impermeability of the shale rock makes the gas to be attached to the clay and mineral particles, as it does not allow the escape of the gas. Similarly, the low impermeability results in the adsorption of the shale gas onto organic material (Pollastro et al., 2007).

Shale gas also exists as free gas in its shale rock. The free gas is held in between the tiny spaces of the rock (micro-porosity, porosity, and pores) or within the spaces brought about by cracking of the rocks in the case of micro-fractures and fractures. Significant analysis of the shale gases in the parent rock reveals that the free gas represents the quantity gas with higher pressures than the other forms of gases in the reservoir. The percentage of the free shale gas in the shale rock ranges from 15 to 80%, depending on the pressure of the reservoir, gas saturation, and porosity. Solution shale gas exists in combination with other liquids such as oil and bitumen. The existence of the gas in solution form translates to the need for the use of sophisticated techniques of obtaining the gas from the solution. Comparative analysis of the three forms in which shale gas is stored places solution form the least mode of storage of the shale gas. In addition, extracting shale gas in dissolved form is harder as compared to the other forms of gas storage (Passey et al., 2010).

How are shale volumes calculated?

The high radioactive nature of shale than that of the sand or the carbonates makes it possible to calculate the volume of shale in the reservoirs. The volume of shale in the reservoir is often expressed as a percentage or a decimal fraction called V (shale). The process of calculating of the volume of shale begins with the calculation of the gamma ray index in the reservoir to evaluate its volume from the ray log of gamma rays. The gamma ray log consists of several linear and nonlinear responses that determine the availability of shale in the reservoir. The nonlinear responses are more optimistic than the linear responses as they are based on the formation age and geographical area of the shale rock. Therefore, the optimistic nature of the nonlinear responses produces shale volumes lower than that obtained from the linear equation (Paquet et al., 2010).

Shale volumes can also be calculated using resistivity shale volume formula. In this case, the shale indicator is dependent on the resistivity response of shale in clean pay sand. A variety of factors, including porosity, salinity of water, and lithology affect the resistivity contrasts seen when calculating the volume of shale using this method. As such, the influence of these factors imply that the calculated volume of the shale from the resistivity can be too high, or too low, or both. The formula for calculating the shale volume using the resistivity is as follows:

vsh=[(Rsh (R,™-R,))/(R,(R^-Rsh))]1/b (Nash, 2010).

In addition, the volume of the shale gas can be calculated based on the neutron-density shale volume method. It allows determination of the volume of shale and effective porosity when the zone consists of effective sands and shales. High-calculated volume of the shale or too low volume of effective porosity will be achieved when there is the presence of the passive shales and other forms of reservoir rocks. The calculated volume of shale can be either pessimistic or optimistic, depending on the matrix parameters used for determining the volume of shale gas. The neuron-density shale volume method of calculating the volume of shale produces three values where the lowest value becomes the volume of shale in relation to the porosity of the rock and hydrocarbon content (Montgomery et al., 2005).

How is shell gas recovered?

The increasing rates of discovery of the use of shale gas in many industries across the world increase the need for the adoption effective recovery methods for shale gas for its sustainability. The recovery methods used for shale gas include the unconventional and enhance gas recovery methods. The unconventional methods of shale gas and oil recovery include the use of horizontal drilling and fracturing to access gas deposits in the coal and shale beds that were considered unattainable. Horizontal drilling entails the making of tunnels at 90 degrees angle to intersect at the site of the shale rock. The shale rock is fractured using hydraulic means to release the gas and provide a pathway for the gas to follow. The method is effective in cases of confirmed abundant availability of the shale rock that will provide a substantial volume of shale gas. Conventional drilling shares great similarities with horizontal drilling, hence, their applicability in the recovery of shale gas from the shale rocks (Loucks & Ruppel, 2007).

Hydraulic fracturing also proves an effective method of recovering shale gas. The method uses hydraulic forces to increase fractures in the shale rocks or coal. The method allows for extraction of different fuels, including methane, tight gas, and shale gas. The hydraulic force originates from the fluids injected into the shale rock under high pressure with a proppant material that opens the cracks. Enhanced methods for shale gas recovery are used in cases of depleted shale gas reservoirs. Such interventions rely on the use of depressurizing techniques that use carbon dioxide gas to depressurize the reservoirs. The carbon dioxide brings carbon sequestering that increases the availability of shale gas. Combining the use of these strategies reduces the incidences of depletion of shale gas reservoirs and minimization of waste of resources (Kinley et al., 2008).

How much is typically recovered and what factors influence the recovery process?

It is beyond doubt that the use of the above stated recovery methods does not provide full acquisition of shale gas from its reservoirs. For example, significant analysis shows that the majority of organizations that use hydraulic fracturing recover only 75% through the process. The rate translates to a loss of 45% of the global natural gas supply and 17% decline in the production of oil globally. The rates of recovery vary significantly across the states. For instance, experience shows that the recovery factors in the U.S. are less transferable than in the U.S. In addition, the rate of recovery across states differs due to the influence of the size of the shale rock and the expected duration of exploitation. Therefore, not all the shale gas is recovered using the above stated methods of recovering shale gas (Berman, 2009).

A variety of factors influences the recovery of shale gas. Among them is the burial history and thermal maturity of the parent shale rock. Rocks of tectonic origin… [END OF PREVIEW]

Future of Natural Gas Term Paper

Marcellus Shale Term Paper

Gas Field Development Term Paper

Marcellus Shale Named for the Town Term Paper

Natural Gas Drilling Thesis

View 22 other related papers  >>

Cite This Literature Review Chapter:

APA Format

Shale Gas Analysis.  (2014, June 30).  Retrieved August 20, 2019, from

MLA Format

"Shale Gas Analysis."  30 June 2014.  Web.  20 August 2019. <>.

Chicago Format

"Shale Gas Analysis."  June 30, 2014.  Accessed August 20, 2019.