Supervision in the Criminal Justice Research Paper

Pages: 10 (2908 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 5  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Junior  ·  Topic: Criminal Justice


The other challenge involves offender punishment.The issue of what form of punishment be given to criminal offenders is paramount. Different groups of people and especially the human rights activists differ with the kind of punishment given saying that some are inhumane. Another main challenge faced by the criminal justice organizations is the provision of services to demeanor offenders. There has been raising concern on how the criminal justice combats crime. For instance, it is always said that the police take a lot of time to respond when alerted in times of crime. This is mainly fueled by deficiency of tools and machinery that facilitate war against crime, for example, inadequate police vehicles and lack of good communication systems in the force (Raine, 1993)

The other challenge faced by many organizations of criminal justice is the kind of charges filed in courts and decisions arrived at in trivial offences which are regarded to be of poor value and usually not rational or well argued. The courts also are widely criticized for applying mutual punishment that does not allocate individual accountability and thus the criminals and the offenders are not properly charged. There is also the challenge of protecting the witnesses and the issue of intimidation of the witness. According to latest findings, the relevant systems of justice should embark upon deficiencies in the application of the existing law to make sure that witnesses are fully protected prior to, in, and after the trials.

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
There is also an issue of investigation by the criminal justice organization. This implies that the investigators involved should be highly equipped with skills, training, and knowledge that will help them in their investigation and hence come up with desired and best methods of investigation that will be able to identify criminals. The use of technologies in curbing criminal activities is of prime importance but also with other technologies criminals can use them in fostering their criminal activities and protecting themselves from being apprehended by the law enforcers. So law enforcers have to be equipped with unique technologies that will help them track the criminal activities without much difficulty (Wilson, 1985)

TOPIC: Research Paper on Supervision in the Criminal Justice Assignment

Another challenge faced by the criminal justice organizations is the constant delays of hearing criminal cases. There is a lot of bureaucracy in judicial systems which have contributed to a lot of inefficiencies in hearing cases related to crime. There is a big challenge in terms of scheduling hearings which is constantly affected by for example by the absence of one defense team and especially the state representatives. This issue is mostly attributed to multiple accused persons thus delaying the courts hearings procedures. So the criminal judicial organizations have to curb such delays by using methods such as hearing of cases of single accused persons in order to increase the pace of court hearings.

There is also another challenge of sentence whereby the judicial systems lack appropriate sentencing thus there is presence of unfair and illegitimate sentencing of individuals. The judges are faced with the challenge of providing uniformity and justice when they are giving out their opinions. The issue of focusing on severity of the crime, the height of participation of the offenders, and other justifying factors should be of priority to judges.

The other title challenge faced by the criminal justice organization is the issue of states cooperation. In essence the respective states or governments play an important role in ensuring that the rule of law is uphold. But usually states are found to be the one encouraging the violations of laws and thus leaving the criminals free because they influence the responsibilities of criminal justice organizations. The senior officials in the governments are found to be contradicting the rule of law through their various undertakings because they are normally feared by the law offenders. However, this is common in third world countries where the officials of the governments are regarded to be mighty and law enforcers fear to hold them accountable. (Eysenck, 1996)


All correctional facilities should adopt the guidelines developed by the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) in 2001 for use by jail administrators as well as their staff in effectively supervising the inmates in their facilities. The most effective method of supervising inmates is the direct and active supervision. The role of prison therefore shifts towards maintaining as well as appropriately controlling the behavior of inmates. One of the main benefits of inmate supervision is the reduction in the level of liability (Keller,2002). The active as well as continuous inmate supervision ensures that the ability of the jail to provide adequate safety of the inmates, visitors and staff is maintained. The supervision should be documented. The active supervision can be made more efficient by increasing the level of officer presence. The staff should also be given the responsibility as well as the authority of conducting regular and even impromptu inspections and be able to make decisions based on their findings. There should be recognition as well as rewarding of the staff behaviors that support the improved roles of both the inmates and staff.


There are many challenges that the criminal justice organizations face and we cannot exhaust them in this paper. These challenges cannot be solved within a short a period and appropriate strategies should be applied in order to ensure smooth transition. Criminal justice administrators should be highly trained to cope with the ever changing world which will help them in carrying out their duties well. The states on the other hand should play a major role in ensuring that the criminal justice organizations enjoy a favorable environment of solving such challenges (Eysenck, 1996).


Atlas, R (1989).Reducing the opportunity for inmate suicide: A design guide.Psychiatric Quarterly, Vol 60(2), Sum 1989, 161-171. doi: 10.1007/BF01064942

Berry, P.E., & Anderson, R. (2001). An evaluation of a private alternative probation and counseling program:Predicting program outcomes from client characteristics. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 121-130.

Brimhall, J (2011).A SQL Experiment-Mentoring

Brown, M; Ross, S. (2010). Mentoring, Social Capital and Desistance: A Study of Women Released from Prison Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology (Australian Academic Press), Apr2010, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p31-50

Courtright, K.E. (1995). A rational examination of the policy issues surrounding the privatization of probation and parole supervision. Perspectives, Winter, 14-20.

Corrections (Ed.), Topics in community corrections: Annual issue 1998: Privatizing community supervision (pp. 19 -- 24). Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections.

Drapkin, M (2009). Management and supervision of jail inmates with mental disorders

DuBois, D.L., Holloway, B.E., Valentine, J.C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157 -- 197.

Eysenck and Hans J (1996)-Personality and Crime- Where do we Stand? Psychology, Crime and Law 2-page 90-101

Kassebaum, G., Seldin, J., Nelligan, P., Takeuchi, D., Wayson, B., Monkman, G., & Meyer. P. (1978).Contracting for correctional services in the community: Volume 1 (NCJ 92778). Washington, DC: U.S.Government Printing Office.

Keller, K (2002).Implementing Effective Inmate Supervision in Jails. Corrections Today, 01902563, Vol. 64, Issue 4

Local Government Insurance Trust (2009).Suicide in jails and prisons.Risk management bulletin. No. 117 March 24, 2009

Leznoff, J. (1998). Privatization of community supervision as a public safety issue. In National Institute of Lindquist, C.A. (1980). The private sector in corrections: Contracting probation services from community organizations.Federal Probation, 44, 58-64.

Onifade, E., Davidson, W., Campbell, C., Turke, G., Malinowski, J., & Turner, K. (2008). Predicting recidivism in probationers with the youth level of service case management inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(4), 474-484.

Raine A. (1993): The Psychopathology of Crime- Criminal Behavior as a Clinical Disorder, San Diego Calif-Academic Press pg 124-145

Reynolds, M.O. (2000). Privatizing probation and parole (NCPA Policy Report No. 233). Dallas, TX: National Center for Policy Analysis. Retrieved December 19, 2005, at

Sherman, L., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Sparrow, H.K.O. (2001). Private probation in Georgia: A new direction. Atlanta, GA: Administrative Officecvof the Courts. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from

Thigpen, M.L., Beauclair, T.J., & Hutchinson, V.A. (2009). Inmate behavior management: The key to a safe and secure jail

Wilson, James Q, Herrnstein and Richard J. (1985) Crime and Human Nature. New York Simon and Schuster pg 56-78

World Health Organization (2000). Preventing suicide a resource for prison officer. [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (10 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Ethics in Criminal Justice Maintaining a High Term Paper

Criminal Justice Process Term Paper

Criminal Justice Explain Community Corrections Term Paper

Criminal Justice - Evaluations Evaluation Methods Thesis

Criminal Justice Field Research Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Supervision in the Criminal Justice" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Supervision in the Criminal Justice.  (2011, June 19).  Retrieved September 28, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Supervision in the Criminal Justice."  19 June 2011.  Web.  28 September 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Supervision in the Criminal Justice."  June 19, 2011.  Accessed September 28, 2021.