Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy Essay

Pages: 4 (1263 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 1  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Doctorate  ·  Topic: Military

¶ … Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy" and "America's Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Generation," focus on President Obama's new strategy of promoting growth and jobs while ensuring national security. However, these articles could be misleading in a way. In light of the president's action towards national security and the climate, it is unclear whether the government may afford to act on national security and climate change at a time when the global economy is under recovery. These articles could be misleading in some way because they imply that actions towards protection could be more costly than it saves. Stabilizing security by empowering the military saves the economy than it would cost to mitigate the effects of insecurity (Art, 2012).

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
The articles contain a new defense strategy created to yield approximately $450 billion in budget savings achievable in the next decade. However, the articles have failed to detail programs that must be trimmed or cut in terms of budget. Instead, the articles outline a generalized vision guiding the defense budget decisions of the administration. These articles maintain that the strategy will ensure an effective and safe nuclear deterrent; however, they do not explain the number of nuclear weapons required for deterrence and the costs involved modernizing and maintaining the U.S. military force (Art, 2012). Nevertheless, the strategy articles, "Reading the Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy" and "America's Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Generation," clearly articulate that it is possible to achieve diverse goals with a small nuclear force. This will minimize the volume of nuclear weapons in the U.S. inventory including their role in the national strategy of U.S..

Essay on Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy Assignment

This plan has attracted remarkable argument across the government. From the two ambitious articles, it is difficult to understand that they are referring to the policy community. It would have been better had the authors thought harder before arguing in the articles. Writers such as Pollack have confessed to having been wrong about nations such as Iraq. In his article, he provides little evidence of his arguments. While most of the administrations get some wrist-slapping light, Pollack argues that the Bush policy is breathtakingly ignorant, arrogant and reckless (Art, 2012).

Most of the judgments in the articles are as sound as the criticism on Bush administration. Because of the stability, prosperity and democratization after the Post-Cold war, it is fundamentally correct argue that the U.S. must commit itself to help the messy countries such as Middle East to come to par. The article proposes a grand strategy similar to America's engagement in the World War II with Europe. Although it is irrational, it is challenging given the global increasing dependency on Middle East oil (Art, 2012).

Basing on the two articles, the challenge is that the U.S. needs to recapitalize every one of the three legs of the atomic triad, and they do not have the money to do it. The articles outline nothing about the part of U.S. atomic weapons in defense policy, but the Obama organization's 2010 Nuclear Posture Review. The gigantic nuclear armor inherited from the Cold War period is defectively suited to address the tests postured by suicidal terrorists and hostile regimes in the 21st century. Keeping up over the top atomic power does nothing to help persuade countries such as Iran or North Korea, or terrorist movements to forsake their pursuit for harmful weapons. It does nothing to motivate nuclear restriction by China and Russia (Art, 2012).

However, the authors are right when they show that tyranny and violence are not hard-chained into Islam besides concluding that the U.S. has overblown the Islamist terror. They are also right to say that internal turmoil in Middle East countries is a strategic threat. This is expected to continue until they develop more opportunities,… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Defense Strategy Essay


Jeremy Black's Rethinking Military History Essay


Military the Multifaceted American Defense Strategies Term Paper


Tom Barnett's Book the Pentagon's New Map Term Paper


Nike's Open Innovation Strategy Essay


View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy.  (2013, August 8).  Retrieved May 11, 2021, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/tea-leaves-obama-new-military-strategy/6036686

MLA Format

"Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy."  8 August 2013.  Web.  11 May 2021. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/tea-leaves-obama-new-military-strategy/6036686>.

Chicago Style

"Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy."  Essaytown.com.  August 8, 2013.  Accessed May 11, 2021.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/tea-leaves-obama-new-military-strategy/6036686.