Home  >  Subjects  >  Education / Teaching / Learning  >  current page My Profile

Textese Social Media Immigrants"Literature Review" Chapter

Pages: 15 (5657 words)  |  Style: n/a  |  Sources: 40

Custom Writing

Textese/Social Media/Immigrants

The Language of Texting and Instant Messaging

The impact of texting and IM (instant messaging) on our syntactical bearing is yet to be thoroughly probed. Grammatical infringements are frequently observed in the text messages that pervade communications in these times. The most common types of transgressions that can be observed are frequently those that are miss-spelt or at variance with the accepted conventions of 'proper' grammar (e.g., use of ur for your or you're, or respelling the -s inflection in friendz) and the deletion of capitals and apostrophes (e.g., im well). Many studies on children and adults have included inclusion of such instances (e.g., Plester et al., 2009; Drouin and Driver, 2012; Rosen et al., 2010), and Tagliamonte and Denis (2008) have focused on the syntactical composition of youngsters texts and' instant messages (IM). Surprisingly only a handful of studies have paid attention specifically on the impact that texting behavior has had on inculcating the verbal and written syntactical conventions and spellings.

Two Opposing Views

Depicted as a mixture of spoken and composed English (Plester and Wood, 2009), textese is to a great extent phonetical (sound-based) type of spelling that can economize text messaging (Leung, 2007). Normal abbreviations, or textisms, incorporate letter homophones, (for example, c for see), number homophones (2day for today), and phonological withdrawals (txt for text) (Plester, Wood, and Joshi, 2009; Thurlow and Brown, 2003). The degree to which textisms are utilized appears to change with age categories and the context and need of the instant message. Research with young people and adolescent grown-ups has demonstrated generally impartial, or surely some negative correlation between messaging conduct (recurrence of texting and/or utilization of textisms), and dialect and reading proficiency abilities (Bushnell et al., 2011). Conversely, the current test research on preadolescent youngsters proposes that the utilization of textese is decidedly connected with customary education abilities. Plester et al. (2008) asked British youngsters of 10 to 12 years to decipher messages from standard English to textese, and thence making use of conventional pen and paper. They discovered a huge positive relationship between extent of textisms utilized and kids' verbal thinking scores and spelling scores. In an alternate study (Plester et al., 2009) kids' utilization of textisms in messages evoked by a set of situations associated emphatically with word perusing capacity and phonological mindfulness. Plester et al. (2008, 2009) propose a few conceivable clarifications for the positive relationship that was observed between messaging and reading proficiency abilities. One is that messaging is essentially an alternate method for gainful introduction to the composed word, which is a positive indicator of perusing achievement. A second probability is that textese permits youngsters to play with words, prompting engagement with conventional spelling and perusing. To add, finally, the production of textisms, which are regularly focused around phonology, may improve youngsters' familiarity with the grapheme-phoneme (letter-sound) correspondence tenets essential for conventional spelling and perusing capability (Bushnell et al., 2011). Thurlow (2006) inspected at least 100 media reports and watched prevalent interpretation of the unfriendly impacts of messaging on Standard English writing proficiency. Purportedly, one English as second language (ESL) school instructor was so taken up about the negative results of his pupils' utilization of cellular telephones "that he chose to take up extra and special lessons to undo the damage and trying to check the impacts" (Coe and Oakhill, 2011). Surely, Drouin and Davis (2009) found that more than a large portion of their school students communicated worry that utilization of textism was having none-too-healthy consequences for their memory of standard composed English, despite the fact that such inclinations may have been impacted by negative media consideration directed at texting and reading proficiency.

Early Papers

In spite of the fact that the most well-known textisms are phonologically-based (e.g., CU L8r for see you later), grammatical mistake and typo-graphical and spelling mistakes are accepted (Madell and Muncer, 2007) and casual spelling and syntax might really be applauded (Vockaert-Legrier, Bernicot, and Bert-Erboul, 2009). The hypothesis of arranged learning proposes that the utilization of textese would extend to all composition "just on the grounds that the curtailed lexical representation is imbued and extended unintentionally thence" (Drouin, 2011). As anyone might expect, accounts from ESL instructors portray textisms "as having an antagonistic impact on kids' composition and language skill" (Powell and Dixon, 2011). Plester, Wood, and Bell (2008) reported that kids who sent more than three instant messages on any given day scored fundamentally lower on measures of verbal and nonverbal thinking than did youngsters who sent less. Crystal (2008a) has observed concerned impacts on the regular learning proficiency if the students texted too frequently.

Texting (SMS use) popularity is on the rise: the quantity of writings sent worldwide was assessed at 7.8 trillion for 2011, with a further 1.8 trillion anticipated for 2012 (Portio Research, 2012). Cell telephone use and texting is now a part and parcel of youngsters' daily habit. Texting is described by a contracted composed structure, initially utilized due to the character limitations forced by cell-phone companies; it has endured and formed into a manifestation of technology inspired talk. Thurlow (2003) has recommended that messaging is "rehashing routine etymological and informative practices." However, there has been worry about the effect that messaging may have on kids' and youngsters' utilization of formal composed English. This is on account of most messaging contractions (or 'textisms') concentrate on unpredictable orthographic representations, which have in place phonological representations, for example, 2 morrow for tomorrow. Condensings and acronyms are not new to composition (Baron, 2003). Curiously, as opposed to commending the imagination obvious in the development of messaging slang, the well-known media have focused on the expected antagonistic effect that the utilization of such dialect should definitely be having on dialect as a rule, and youngsters' and youngsters' education abilities specifically (Crystal, 2008b). As a result of such concerns, research of late has considered how learning and utilization of textisms may be identified with "customary" education aptitudes. In the first of these studies, Plester, Wood, and Bell (2008) evaluated learning of textisms by means of a basic interpretation assignment and found that that youngsters aged 10-12 years who tended to utilize more textisms exhibited better imagination in use of language. Also, Plester, Wood, and Joshi (2009) asked 10-12-year-olds to build instant messages based on imagination, and found that the individuals who utilized more textisms had a tendency to have better word perusing, vocabularies and phonological mindfulness. Plester et al. hypothesized that the purpose behind this finding was that translating and making most textisms obliges a certain level of phonological mindfulness, an ability known to underpin fruitful writing proficiency. They consequently anticipated that the relationship between textism and reading capacity would cease once singular contrasts in phonological mindfulness had been considered. They, however, found that textism utilization could even now foresee extraordinary difference in perusing capacity in the wake of controlling for age, transient memory, phonological mindfulness, vocabulary and time allotment the kids had possessed a cellular telephone. These early studies proposed that not just was there no confirmation of a negative relationship between writing proficiency conclusions and learning of textisms, instead cause education improvement in startling ways (Wood et al., 2014). The results from these studies has been upheld by Kreiner and Davis (2011), who found that information of shortened forms was decidedly connected with spelling scores yet recurrence of writings was most certainly not. This recommends that it is not the amount of messages that are sent which is paramount, instead the substance of messages as for levels of messaging slang utilized (Wood et al., 2014).

The negative relation between texting and capacity to learn was thus found to be improper. That was not a proper evaluation, though, as the inferences were drawn from paper and pencil tests. In studies that are more recent actual textism was tested in kids and the results do agree. For example, Coe and Oakhill (2011) found that there was hardly any difference in the abilities of children who were 10-11 tears old irrespective of the messages they were exposed to. Those using more textism, were found to be more proficient, though (Wood et al., 2014).

The main contention of the media theory about texting and learning proficiency is: namely, that textism use causes impediment to proper learning in the growing-up stage. In spite of the fact that there is no immediate and express proof to that effect, the causation effects have to be appropriated over time and two such attempts have already been made (Wood et al., 2014).

Wood, Meacham, Bowyer, Jackson, Tarczynski-Bowles, and Plester (2011) obtained data (during a span of an academic year) from one hundred and nineteen 8- to 12-year-old children who owned phones. It was ascertained that texting since the start of the academic year had caused proficiency in spelling ability at the end of the session after controlling for individual age difference, IQ (verbal), phonetic mindfulness and the spelling capability estimated at the beginning. As against that, the converse not found to be true. It appears… [END OF PREVIEW]

Download Full Paper (15 pages; perfectly formatted; Microsoft Word file) Microsoft Word File

How Social Media Has Changed the Way We Communicate


Does Social Media and Instant Communication Stifle Imagination?


Social Media and CRM


Media Technology Explain the Concepts


Collaboration on Social Media


View 1,000+ other related papers  >>

Cite This Paper:

APA Format

Textese Social Media Immigrants.  (2014, November 15).  Retrieved November 21, 2017, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/textese-social-media-immigrants/8278508

MLA Format

"Textese Social Media Immigrants."  15 November 2014.  Web.  21 November 2017. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/textese-social-media-immigrants/8278508>.

Chicago Format

"Textese Social Media Immigrants."  Essaytown.com.  November 15, 2014.  Accessed November 21, 2017.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/textese-social-media-immigrants/8278508.

Disclaimer