Trade Balance Research Paper

Pages: 7 (2225 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 10  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Economics

Trade Balance

The concept of trade balance dates back at least as far as Ricardo. Samuelson noted in 1964 that the theory of comparative advantage, in which international trade is explained, does not promise that there will be equilibrium of trade balance. Samuelson, however, was writing during the Bretton Woods period, when currencies were more or less fixed in value. Since the adoption of free float, the notion of trade balance equilibrium has become more a likelihood. It has been posited that there is equilibrium in trade balance. This paper will examine and discuss this theory. Some of the literature will be discussed, as will the impacts of long-run disequilibrium.

Trade Balance

The trade balance is the difference between the value of exports and the value of imports in an economy. If the value of exports is higher, the economy is said to have a trade surplus. If the value of imports is higher, the economy is said to have a trade deficit. Over the long-run, it is believed that equilibrium should emerge. In particular, it is believed that no nation can support a trade deficit on a permanent basis. Equilibrium is achieved when an economy faces currency devaluation as the result of long-term deficits. Under such a situation, the increase in the value of the currency would theoretically make exports less expensive, increasing exports; imports would be more expensive, increasing imports. This would bring the economy back to equilibrium under a very basic version of trade theory.Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Research Paper on Trade Balance Assignment

The trade balance is significant for an economy because it is a proxy for economic growth. Roughly, nations with a trade surplus are gaining wealth and nations with a trade deficit are losing wealth. Even under Ricardo's most basic example of comparative advantage, the nations need to trade equally in order to achieve equal mutual benefit. Long-run disequilibrium in trade may indicate that nations are trading on absolute advantage instead of comparative advantage. In such a scenario, the trade would be inefficient, to the detriment of both parties. This does not imply that the trade will trend towards long-run equilibrium, only that it should. If the parties are not rational, or if there are significant structural impediments to true free trade, equilibrium may be impossible to achieve.

Nations should seek equilibrium. A nation with a persistent trade surplus will be faced with inflation; nations with persistent deficits will face crippling debt payments. Wealth transfer in either direction can be sustained for years, possibly even decades, but eventually it will be critical for the health of the economy that the trade balance evens out. Krugman and Baldwin (1986) showed that long-term trade disequilibrium also causes feedback loops. They found that when the U.S. dollar traded at a persistently high level, this reduced U.S. exports. Those exports, however, were not to be recovered if the dollar dropped (which equilibrium would predict). Instead, the market position surrendered would have been taken by foreign firms and the American firms would not re-enter the foreign market. This means that the price elasticity for U.S. firms to export would have permanent implications that would impact on the ability of the economy to return to equilibrium based on a reversal of exchange rates. This brings into question the ability of the economy to ever find equilibrium.


Disequilibrium is common in world trade today. Nations such as China, Germany and Canada have run persistent trade long-run trade surpluses. The United States is among many nations that has faced a long-run trade deficit. The United States in particular makes for a good example. The U.S. is typically in a trade deficit position with both Canada and China. However, trade with Canada has traditionally fluctuated in relation to the prevailing currency exchange rates. When the C$ is high, the trade trends back towards equilibrium. The Chinese yuan, however, is on tightly controlled float, almost wholly pegged to the dollar. As a result, there is no natural control to the trade deficit and it has consistently expanded in recent years as China enjoys an absolute advantage in the production of most goods.

This shows that the exchange rate and the balance of trade bear a strong relationship. Thus, it has been theorized that a decline in the exchange rate of the party with the deficit will bring the trade back towards equilibrium. The Marshall-Lerner condition argues that this does not occur, at least not immediately. This is because the price of goods is not perfectly elastic, and because there is often a time delay on the impact of currency exchange rate changes. As the price of imports increases, the amount of imports will fall; as the cost of exports decreases, the amount of exports will increase. This condition implies that the trade balance will not improve in the short run as the result of a change in the exchange rates and may in fact worsen (Bhamani-Oskooee & Niroomand, 1998). Over time, however, consumers will adjust to the new price levels and the expected shifts in consumption will materialize. This is what is known as the J-curve (Backus & Kehoe, 1994).

It has been shown that Marshall-Lerner often does not hold -- in Turkey (Akbostanci, 2002) and in China (Ahmad & Yang, 2004). That there is little evidence to support Marshall-Lerner and the presence of a J-curve despite the predictions of the model, then the prospect of externalities must be considered. In Turkey and China -- two economies with heavy central government involvement -- the J-Curve does not exist. This indicates that with sufficient externalities, disequilibrium can be sustained. In China's case, the lack of free float on the yuan is widely speculated as one factor behind that country's persistent trade surplus.

Government involvement can also be another externality -- taxes and trade policy in particular can impact on the amount of trade that occurs between a nation and the rest of the world. Marshall Lerner also hints at elasticity being another externality. If a country does not have a J-curve, that could indicate that consumers are perfectly elastic to a price, refuting both Marshall Lerner and the J-curve. If consumers are perfectly inelastic, that could refute the J-curve as well. A major factor in the trade deficit of the United States is oil, and U.S. consumers have very low price elasticity of demand for oil. Currency fluctuations or changes in the price of crude oil have only marginal impact on the demand for oil, meaning that a currency decline will not bring the trade deficit back to equilibrium.

Impacts of Disequilibrium

Disequilibrium represents a transfer of wealth from one country to the next. Taking the United States and China as an example, because the trade balance between the two is large and is heavily impacted by China's currency policy, there are many outcomes. The Chinese economy grows, causing inflation. Under normal circumstances, it would be expected that this inflation would cause the value of the yuan to decline relative to the U.S. dollar. Instead in China inflation is high but the yuan moves slowly. Without active currency controls, the value of the yuan would be expected to increase sharply against the dollar. The U.S. dollar itself should be predicted to be on a long-term decrease against most other world currencies. There are externalities that prevent this from occurring sometimes. The U.S. dollar in particular sees strong demand as the world's safety currency, which is a source of demand only loosely related to economic fundamentals. As such, the U.S. dollar does not decline as much or as fast as it should.

Marshall Lerner predicts that the balance of trade will decrease if a currency decreases, until eventually consumers adjust, resulting in a J-curve. While externalities prevent a J-curve in government-controlled economies, it should hold in developed economies. Yet Rose (1991) showed that the J-Curve does not hold. Krugman & Baldwin (1998) argue that there is only a minor J-Curve effect and that other factors such as the decline in U.S. technological and productivity advantage may also be key drivers of trade levels. From a Ricardian standpoint, there is merit to that theory in that the U.S. may lose comparative advantage in high value goods and services, reducing its high value exports. If this cannot be matched by an increase in exports or a decrease in imports, then the U.S. trade deficit would indeed increase.

Mahmud, Ullah and Yucel (2004) found evidence that Marshall Lerner is only satisfied during fixed exchange rate regimes. Indeed, following on the findings of Krugman & Baldwin (1986), Marshall Lerner does not apply because once spending or trading patterns have changed as the result of a currency exchange rate fluctuation, those changes are difficult to reverse, even when the currency has revalued and the economics support such a reversal. The decisions undertaken by business in such a scenario may not be rational, but they are the decisions that are made in real world examples.

With the evidence running against long-run equilibrium, Himarios (2007) shows that long-run equilibrium is possible.… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (7 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

U.S. Trade Balance and Exchange Rate Term Paper

Balance of Payments Multiple Chapters

U.S. Trade Data From the U.S. Census Term Paper

Trade Issues in Economic Development Term Paper

Balance of Payments Term Paper

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Trade Balance" Research Paper in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Trade Balance.  (2010, April 28).  Retrieved October 20, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Trade Balance."  28 April 2010.  Web.  20 October 2020. <>.

Chicago Style

"Trade Balance."  April 28, 2010.  Accessed October 20, 2020.