Washington Mutual Thesis

Pages: 5 (1661 words)  ·  Style: MLA  ·  Bibliography Sources: 6  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Economics

¶ … banking and the current fiscal crisis. Specifically it will discuss the failure of Washington Mutual (WaMu). The financial crisis in the United States is mounting, and it shows no signs of ending anytime soon. The American automakers are seeking a financial bailout, Congress passed a massive bailout for the banking and financial industry that seems to have stalled, businesses are failing at a high rate, and people are losing jobs at the highest rate in decades. The economy is in serious trouble, and the Washington Mutual failure, the largest bank failure in history, has helped make this crisis memorable and painful for many investors across the nation. Washington Mutual, a Seattle-based lender failed on September 26, 2008, when the FDIC seized the bank's holdings and financial giant JP Morgan Chase took over the bank. It was a shocking element of the financial crisis, because it was such a major bank to fail, and it stemmed from several different distressing issues. Although Washington Mutual seemed like a very reliable West Coast bank to put one's money in, Washington Mutual remains one of the largest banks in United States' history to fail.Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77

Thesis on Washington Mutual Assignment

Up until 2007 or so, Washington Mutual seemed like a charmed financial institution. Founded in 1889 to help the city of Seattle recover after a devastating fire, the bank gradually grew to become America's largest savings and loan, and a profitable Wall Street investment (Editors 1). It pioneered a new type of banking experience called "Occasio," (which is Latin for "favorable opportunity), and attempted to change the entire face of banking. One author notes, "Entering an Occasio branch, the customer is first greeted by a 'concierge' who escorts them to the appropriate area. [...] There are no desks to be found in the branch. Instead, bank representatives work at electronic 'teller towers'" (Schmitt 157). It seemed that WaMu was at the top of the banking game and could never topple. That is what make WaMu's fall so shocking to most Americans. It seemed to happen so quickly, and that one so large could fail so fast was doubly frightening. WaMu made some major mistakes that led the bank to fail, and sub-prime mortgage leading was a huge part in Washington Mutual's downward spiral. Sub-prime mortgage lending began in 2004 as house prices soared throughout the country. The economy was strong, people were buying and selling homes at a rapid rate, and prices continued to climb out of reach of many Americans. The sub-prime mortgage game became a way for Americans to afford the home of their dreams with payments that seemed within reach - at least for a while. These low-interest rate mortgages used very low introductory interest rates to lure buyers in, and then, in a specific number of years, these variable-rate loans would mature, and so would the payments, leaving scores of buyers unable to pay their increased mortgages by 2007 and beyond. Unfortunately, a major part of WaMu's investment portfolio included these sub-prime, adjustable-rate mortgages. Two Bloomberg reporters note, "Washington Mutual held $52.9 billion of the mortgages, also called option ARMs or negative amortization loans, on its books in the second quarter, with defaults doubling to $3.2 billion from the end of 2007, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission" (Ivy and Shen). Analysts believe that at least 45% of borrowers across the nation who hold these adjustable-rate mortgages will default, and WaMu's borrowers were no exception, in fact, WaMu targeted areas where home sales were highest. They had about half of their ARMs in California, where the foreclosure rate was the second highest in the nation, and about 13% of their ARMs were in Florida, where foreclosures were the fourth highest in the nation (Ivy and Shen). It is easy to see how this practice came back to haunt WaMu.

Washington Mutual actually encouraged their mortgage brokers and underwriters to target individuals that could barely afford to pay the minimum monthly payment. They concentrated on lower-income borrowers, the perfect target for ARMs since in made monthly payments affordable for the first few years of the mortgage. The Editors of the "New York Times" note, "A strategy that had allowed for the bank's phenomenal growth -- focusing on lower-income borrowers -- was now responsible for devastating losses" (Editors 1). Many of these borrowers did not fully understand the terms of the mortgages they signed, and did not understand that the payments would rise dramatically within a few years, (as much as 63%, or over $1,000 per month in many cases (Ivy and Shen). In addition, as housing prices began to fall in 2007, many of these sub-prime borrowers could not refinance their loans, because their house values had dropped so much that they owed more on the home than the house was now worth. It turned into a financial nightmare for WaMu, who had invested so heavily in this market in the beginning.

At the head of the WaMu phenomenon was Kerry Killinger, a 25-year employee of the institution who had led the company successfully for 18 years, and who stepped down as CEO on Sept. 9, just a few short weeks before the meltdown. In an early 2001 interview, Killinger said, "Our goal is to be the dominant mortgage lender in the U.S.,' says Killinger. Within five years, he says, he hopes WaMu will hold a 15% market share in both origination and servicing" (Cocheo 22). They met that goal by acquiring mortgage firms and borrowing to acquire them, eventually building up the biggest mortgage holdings in the nation. However, these mortgage companies (and others) were often underwriting loans without fully checking out the borrowers. The Bloomberg reporters continue, "About 83% of the option ARMs issued from 2004 to 2007 were underwritten without full documentation of borrowers' incomes, Fitch said" (Ivy and Shen). Thus, these borrowers were the most vulnerable to problems down the line with their ARMs, and yet, they were allowed to buy homes, often at inflated prices due to the rising house market, with incomes that could in no way manage the great rise in payments that would occur when the loans reset. In the meantime, these borrowers often borrowed more money on their homes through refinancing or second mortgages when values rose, creating even more debt to pay off as the homes' values decreased. It was a shoddy way to lend money through mortgage institutions, and it too came back to haunt WaMu.

Another aspect of the current economic crisis helped cause WaMu to fail. As word began to spread that its' mortgage holdings were so volatile, and rumors spread that it could actually fail, depositors began to remove their funds in mass numbers, the classic bank run. Two other writers note, "It was not just the largest failure in history. It was also extraordinarily quick and almost entirely painless from the government's point-of-view. Its collapse was caused by an old phenomenon -- a bank run -- that occurred in a new way, driven largely by Internet rumors out of the public eye" (Adler and Hopkins). As the investors began to clamor for their money, Killinger hoped to sell the institution for a profit and to keep creditors at bay, but the bank had been too devalued by the bank run. Journalists Adler and Hopkins continue, "But it was already too late. By that time a run had begun, with deposit outflows eventually totaling $16.7 billion" (Adler and Hopkins). It was only a few days later that the FDIC stepped in, seized the bank, and JP Morgan Chase took over.

The customers of WaMu did not lose money, as their deposits were guaranteed up to $100,000 by the FDIC, and JP Morgan Chase agreed to guarantee the rest. However, bondholders and stockholders of the company were… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (5 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Mutual Fund Disclosure for the SEC Essay


Qualities of Washington Essay


HR Manager Interview Term Paper


George Washington's Farewell Term Paper


Major Part of George Washington Farewell Thesis


View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Washington Mutual" Thesis in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Washington Mutual.  (2008, December 11).  Retrieved October 19, 2020, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/washington-mutual/873045

MLA Format

"Washington Mutual."  11 December 2008.  Web.  19 October 2020. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/washington-mutual/873045>.

Chicago Style

"Washington Mutual."  Essaytown.com.  December 11, 2008.  Accessed October 19, 2020.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/washington-mutual/873045.