Weight Sigma Psychological and Social Essay

Pages: 4 (1390 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 4  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Culture

SAMPLE EXCERPT . . .

It is seen that people in the same group usually have positive attitude towards each other. However, in obese people it is seen that they show lack of sympathy and hold negative attitude towards other group mates. This devaluation of obese people for each other is known as in-group devaluation.

Living With Obesity-Australian Context

Another important research done to investigate the impact of both lived experience of obesity and the influence of socio-cultural issues on people living with obesity. Community sampling methods along with purposive sampling techniques were used to ensure that a diverse range of individuals were included from Australian population. Participants negated the idea of increasing culture of 'blame' in contradiction of people living with obesity spread by media and public health messages. Majority said that they detested or hated the word obesity and would rather prefer to be called fat or overweight.

The results deduced from the research led to vital conclusions. Firstly, the experiences of obesity are varied, but there are common reasons. Secondly, people living with fatness are aware of the messages but find it difficult to act upon them. Lastly, reconsider about how to deal with obesity problems in order to avoid summarizing damaging social stereotypes and worsening social inequalities (L. & Thomas, 2008). These results proposed that ways to deal with obesity issues need to be modified in order to attain fruitful results. Although people are well aware of the risks associated with this problem but this biasness towards them leads to a failure to accomplish the goal to deal with the issue.

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
Harris and Bochner (1982)investigated stereotypes of physical appearance which also included obesity. In this experimental study, participants read a description of a fictitious target person. The description of the target person was manipulated across experimental conditions for weight (overweight vs. average weight) and glasses (wears glasses vs. glasses not mentioned). Following is the comparison of those ratings on the scale of 0-5

Graph-1

Rating of Overweight vs. Avg. Weight

TOPIC: Essay on Weight Sigma Psychological and Social Assignment

The graph in figure 1 shows the comparison of rating done by the participants. Horizontal axis shows the attributes described in the fictional character whereas vertical axis shows the rating of the participants. It is noted that participants rated the average weight fictional character more than the overweight one, thus proving the stereotype of people.

Figure 1: Rating of Overweight vs. Avg. Weight Fictional Character by Participants

Intelligence, happy, popular and outgoing was closely rated in both variables; with fractional difference. The adjectives with largest difference among overweight and average weight are active, hardworking, attractive, successful, athletic and appropriately sex-typed. Rating shows that according to this study, overweight people are very less athletic and were not appropriately sex-typed.

Graph-2

Rating of Glasses vs. No Glasses

The graph in figure 2 shows the comparison of rating done by the participants on fictional character with altered physical appearance. Horizontal axis shows the attributes described in the fictional character whereas vertical axis shows the rating of the participants. It is noted that participants rated the average weight fictional character more than the overweight one, thus proving the stereotype of people.

Figure 2: Rating of Fictional Character Wearing Glasses Vs. No Glasses by Participants

In the variables glasses and no glasses, there was minimal difference in ratings of variables. Only active and outgoing had large difference. The study showed that people rated fictional character who wore glasses as more intelligent and more appropriately sex-typed.

Bibliography

B., C., & Wott. (2010). Overt weight stigma, psychological distress and weight loss treatment outcomes. Journal of Health Psychology, 608-614.

Harris, M.B., Harris, R.J., & Bochner, S. (1982). Fat, Four-Eyed, and Female: Stereotypes of Obesity, Glasses, and Gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12(6), 503-516.

L., S., & Thomas. (2008). Being 'fat' in today's world: A qualitative study of the lived experiences of people with obesity in Australia. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 321-330.

Puhl, R.M., & Heuer, C.A. (2009). The Stigma of Obesity: A Review and Update. Obesity, 941-964.

Wang, S.S., Brownell, K.D., & Wadden, T.A. (2004). The influence of the stigma of… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

?
Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Social Psychology Social Beliefs and Judgments Humans Term Paper


Social Change Plan Program Research Paper


Psychological and Cognitive Barriers of Effective Decision-Making Term Paper


Social Psychology Cognitive Dissonance Term Paper


Psychological Effects of Racism on Minority Groups Research Paper


View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Weight Sigma Psychological and Social" Essay in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Weight Sigma Psychological and Social.  (2012, December 18).  Retrieved September 23, 2021, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/weight-sigma-psychological-social/3212175

MLA Format

"Weight Sigma Psychological and Social."  18 December 2012.  Web.  23 September 2021. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/weight-sigma-psychological-social/3212175>.

Chicago Style

"Weight Sigma Psychological and Social."  Essaytown.com.  December 18, 2012.  Accessed September 23, 2021.
https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/weight-sigma-psychological-social/3212175.