Win-Win Peer Mentoring and Tutoring Program Research Proposal

Pages: 4 (1227 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 1  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: College Senior  ·  Topic: Leadership

¶ … Win-Win Peer Mentoring and Tutoring Program; a Collaborative Model

The Big Buddies program is a peer mentoring tutoring project designed to decrease the school dropout rate and increase youth interest in volunteerism. Susan Dennison review this program in the article "A win-win peer mentoring and tutoring program; a collaborative model." This important works can provide an example that can be used to develop similar programs in other areas of the country. The following review examines the quality of the research project as presented in the article.

The first area that will be explored is the literature review. The literature review provides the rationale and development of the theoretical underpinnings of the article. The literature review for Dennison's article presented an excellent summary of research from both a historical perspective and in a modern context. It is comprehensive and provides an organized overview of theory regarding state of the art mentoring programs at the time of the research. It highlights the development of current theory on peer mentoring. Dennison's article was published in the year 2000. However, many of the articles referenced in the literature review were over 10 years old at the time the article was written. More recent articles would have provided a better underpinning for the development of the literature review.

Download full Download Microsoft Word File
paper NOW!
The purpose of the article is to describe the Big Buddies program and to report the results of a program evaluation. It is apparent that the research will use a case study approach, although this is not clearly stated in the purpose statement. This type of research design does not have t clearly defined independent and dependent variable, as in a comparative or empirical study design. Aside from these formal elements, the study lacked a clearly stated hypothesis. It is simply a review of another research evaluation conducted by the Big Buddies program in the selected community setting.

Research Proposal on Win-Win Peer Mentoring and Tutoring Program; a Assignment

In the Program Evaluation Design, the hypothesis is not stated. Therefore, the purpose of the study is not clear. It is apparent from the context of the section that the "quasi-experimental" design is mean to evaluate the effectiveness of the Big Buddies program using a non-equivalent control group design. However, the lack of a formal hypothesis and accompanying set of research questions hinders the ability of the researcher to determine if the study in deed met its implied goals and objectives.

The sample selection criteria for the research study used two groups of 25 "at risk" elementary students. The test was repeated using two groups of 25 "at risk" high school students as well. It is not known if the study population was sufficient to be representative of the school population, as this information was not provided. The intention of increasing the reliability of the method by repeating the study with different age group was a good idea, but unfortunately did not work due to the inability to obtain two matched groups.

It is not known what elements of the selection criteria determined that a student is "at risk." Little Buddies consisted of third and fourth grade students, as teachers felt that these grades represented the initial emergence of risk factors for school drop out. The importance of early intervention and the transition from elementary to middle school were supported by evidence in the literature review. However, it may be noted that no rationale or evidence was presented for this particular age group through empirical studies. Therefore, this factor may be subject to an error of assumption on the part of the teachers and the researcher, who stated that it became apparent at this age with no evidence to support this claim in the literature review. Presentation of research to… [END OF PREVIEW] . . . READ MORE

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Download full paper (4 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Mentoring Has Long Been Used in Academic Term Paper

Mentor Responsibility Term Paper

Mentoring Program for Professional Women Respondents' Profile Research Proposal

Marketing Community College Programs A) a Local Term Paper

Nuclear WMD a Real Threat A-Level Coursework

View 200+ other related papers  >>

How to Cite "Win-Win Peer Mentoring and Tutoring Program" Research Proposal in a Bibliography:

APA Style

Win-Win Peer Mentoring and Tutoring Program.  (2009, October 7).  Retrieved April 12, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Win-Win Peer Mentoring and Tutoring Program."  7 October 2009.  Web.  12 April 2021. <>.

Chicago Style

"Win-Win Peer Mentoring and Tutoring Program."  October 7, 2009.  Accessed April 12, 2021.