Zoning and Development Case Study

Pages: 7 (1807 words)  ·  Bibliography Sources: 8  ·  File: .docx  ·  Level: Master's  ·  Topic: Urban Studies

Buy full Download Microsoft Word File paper
for $19.77


[. . .] An Economic Feasibility Study;

b. An Amendment to the North County, South County and Downtown City General Plans;

c. An Environmental Impact Report;

d. Annexation;

e. Financing.


Attempted development of the Natomas Joint Vision Project Area gave rise to competing interests among County North, County South, Downtown City, FEMA, Advocacy groups such as the HCP Conservancy, landowners, airport planners and developers. With the recommended Win-Win method of conflict resolution and applying the Charrette method, economic equity can be provided to all stakeholders through drafting an MOU among County South, County North and Downtown City, and implementation of an economic feasibility study, amendment to the general plans of North County, South County and Downtown City, an Environmental Impact Report, appropriate annexation and appropriate financing.

Works Cited

Aspen Environmental Group. (2010). Energy Aware: Facility Siting and Permitting Guide. Retrieved from California Energy Commission Web site: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publications/CEC-600-2010-007/CEC-600-2010-007.pdf

Callihan, D., Kleiman, D., & Tirnauer, J. (2009). An Independent Evaluation of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's Habitat Conservation Plan Program. Washington, D.C.: Management Systems International.

City of Sacramento, CA Planning Department. (2009, June 22). Natomas Joint Vision. Retrieved from City of Sacramento Web site: http://www.cityofsacramento.org/planning/projects/natomas-joint-vision/

Granicus. (2008). 2030 Sacramento General Plan: East Sacramento Community Plan. Sacramento, CA: Granicus.

National Charrette Institute. (2011). National Charrette Institute: Charrettes for Regional and Comprehensive Planning. Retrieved from Charrette Institute Web site: http://www.charretteinstitute.org/projects/regional-planning.html

Newell, C. (2008). Managing local government: Cases in effectiveness (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.: ICMA Press.

Sacramento Housing and Redevopment Agency. (2007). County of Sacramento: 2008-2012 Consolidated Plan. Retrieved from SHRA.org Web site: http://www.shra.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=irx-9qf6VNc%3D&tabid=88&mid=392

Stark, P.B., & Flaherty, J. (2003). The Only Negotiating Guide You'll Ever Need: 101 Ways to Win Every Tiime in Any Situation. New York,… [END OF PREVIEW]

Two Ordering Options:

Which Option Should I Choose?
1.  Buy full paper (7 pages)Download Microsoft Word File

Download the perfectly formatted MS Word file!

- or -

2.  Write a NEW paper for me!✍🏻

We'll follow your exact instructions!
Chat with the writer 24/7.

Dyslexia of 8-Year-Old Boy Case Study

Real Estate Development Case Study

Company Case Analysis Term Paper

Current Urban Ecology of American Cities Essay

Affordable Housing and the Use of Exclusionary and Inclusionary Zoning Term Paper

View 91 other related papers  >>

Cite This Case Study:

APA Format

Zoning and Development.  (2011, December 22).  Retrieved January 20, 2020, from https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/zoning-development-case-study/3875418

MLA Format

"Zoning and Development."  22 December 2011.  Web.  20 January 2020. <https://www.essaytown.com/subjects/paper/zoning-development-case-study/3875418>.

Chicago Format

"Zoning and Development."  Essaytown.com.  December 22, 2011.  Accessed January 20, 2020.